The Full Story and Key Issues of the Democratic Party's 'Oppa Gate'

Critics argue that if decision-making authority, delegated by the people through voting, is exercised by an external force rather than the assembly member themselves, it shakes the foundation of representative democracy. Attorney Kang Dae-gyu likened Assemblywoman Yong Hye-in to a 'marionette,' suggesting the possibility of someone behind her. This suspicion raises questions about the autonomous decision-making ability of elected representatives, leading to calls for an investigation into the existence of a behind-the-scenes power.

This relationship is also cited as the background for the theory that Assemblywoman Yong Hye-in is being controlled.

On August 14, when he was a party leader candidate, he expressed full support for Representative Lee Jae-myung's proposed four-year presidential term with the possibility of re-election. At that time, Assemblyman Kim advocated for a four-year presidential term with re-election and strengthened parliamentary powers. However, in his address as a negotiating group representative, the tone was softened to a more abstract 'a feasible constitutional amendment within what the people want.' This change is analyzed as a strategic distancing due to Representative Lee Jae-myung's declining approval ratings.

The recent party leader's address was also evaluated as largely praising Representative Lee Jae-myung and foreshadowing his era of sole leadership.

The assessment followed that it is difficult to find new justifications for the development of the Republic of Korea's National Assembly.

Concerns were also raised that such incitement of anti-American sentiment could lead to the alienation of the 20s and 30s generations.

Attorney Kang Dae-gyu pointed out, "Calling North Korea a second state is a clear violation of Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution, making it an unconstitutional statement." This assertion violates Articles 3 (Territorial Clause) and 4 (Peaceful Unification Policy) of the Republic of Korea's Constitution, effectively recognizing the armistice line as a de facto national border and abandoning efforts for unification, which is an unconstitutional act. This raises concerns about negative impacts on peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.

An analysis suggests that 60% of crude oil imported by Korea comes through the Strait of Hormuz, and this has been stably maintained thanks to the security costs provided by the United States. Lee Jun-woo, media spokesperson, emphasized that if the U.S. fails to control the Strait of Hormuz, severe damage to the Korean economy would be inevitable. He added that arguments distorting alliance relations into those of subservience or colonialism are anachronistic, and that Korea must accurately recognize the indispensable role of the U.S. in its economic security.

Suspicions related to Assemblyman Kim Seung-won are showing signs of expanding into an 'Oppa Gate' scandal. Lee Jun-woo, media spokesperson, believes this incident could escalate into an 'Oppa Gate.' Discrepancies have emerged between Assemblyman Kim's doorknocking statements and factual accounts, and the possibility of an expanded lobbying target has been raised as Ms. Yang Su-jin mentioned numerous 'oppa.' Consequently, securing Ms. Yang Su-jin's cell phone has become central to the investigation, and attention is focused on whether the true nature of the case will be revealed through it.

Support for a special prosecutor has been proposed as a criterion to distinguish 'oppa' in the suspicions related to Assemblyman Kim Seung-won. Attorney Kang Dae-gyu pointed out that the People Power Party is preparing for a special prosecutor, and whoever opposes it is an 'oppa.' This strategy aims to identify specific individuals within the Democratic Party referred to as 'oppa,' with supporting a special prosecutor presented as a way to prove one is not an 'oppa.' This situation suggests the possible existence of various 'oppa' within the opposition, raising concerns that the incident could spread more widely than expected.

Doubts were also raised about Assemblyman Kim's statement during a doorknocking interview mentioning a 'legal professionals' cafe,' suggesting the possibility of a very close relationship beyond just a professional one. Clarifying the timeline of their relationship is crucial to uncovering the truth of the incident.

It was emphasized that past cases with suspended indictment or non-indictment dispositions can be re-investigated if they have not received a court judgment. Attorney Kang Dae-gyu stated that for cases without a court ruling, whether suspended indictment or non-indictment, the principle of double jeopardy does not apply, allowing for re-investigation. This raises expectations for a re-investigation of the case related to Assemblyman Kim Seung-won, which received a suspended indictment in December 2024. It is argued that a re-investigation of related cases should occur through securing the cell phone and establishing a special prosecutor.

An analysis suggests that political considerations may have influenced the police's announcement to 'review' the re-investigation of the case related to Assemblyman Kim Seung-won. Attorney Kang Dae-gyu highlighted the police's use of 'review' rather than 'will re-investigate,' emphasizing the word 'review.' This indicates a political consideration by the police to avoid exposing the suspect's status before an confirmation hearing, while also demonstrating investigative capability and fairness to appease public opinion. It was pointed out that this might be a move to calm public sentiment at this moment rather than an actual commencement of re-investigation.