Earl Spencer's Book Angers Palace

Buckingham Palace has taken the unusual step of strongly reacting to revelations in a new book by Charles Spencer, the brother of the late Princess Diana. The book, which is being serialized in the Daily Mail, claims that the then-Prince Charles allegedly told Spencer after Diana's death that people would forget about her very quickly. This response contrasts with the royal motto of "never complain, never explain," suggesting the severity of the claims.

The book is anticipated to contain further revelations and "robust criticism of Camilla." Despite ongoing royal controversies, the focus remains on the impact on Diana's sons, William and Harry, who are still viewed as central to the unfolding drama.

In that eulogy, Spencer described Diana as "the most hunted person of the modern age" and indicated that her "blood family" would look after her sons, William and Harry, in a way the royal family could not. This statement was made amidst criticism that the royal family remained at Balmoral immediately after Diana's death.

Critics immediately took sides following Earl Spencer's book revelations, recalling his actions after Princess Diana's funeral. Despite his eulogy promising that the "blood family" would care for William and Harry, Spencer moved back to South Africa shortly after. This move raised questions about his commitment to the boys, especially considering King Charles's own upbringing and how the royal family handled Diana's death.

Following Princess Diana's death, no flag flew at Buckingham Palace because she was no longer a member of the royal family, having been stripped of her HRH title—a decision many viewed as a mistake. The Queen's adherence to protocol on this matter drew widespread criticism, as it overlooked the profound shock and grief felt globally, not just within the United Kingdom. This rigid adherence to tradition further highlighted the perceived coldness of the royal family's initial response.

This strong reaction suggests that King Charles felt deeply misrepresented by Spencer's account. The long-standing animosity between the Spencer and royal families has roots in history, with the families once being close before Diana's father's death, after which their relationship became more distant and fraught, culminating in an "explosive" fallout following Diana's tragic death.

Diana often changed her story, making it difficult to ascertain the exact context of events and conversations surrounding her life and death. Ingrid Seward, who interviewed Diana a month before her death, noted Diana's evolving narratives. Furthermore, it is believed Diana was not speaking to her brother, Earl Spencer, at the time of her death, due to her tendency to have vendettas with various people.

While Charles may not have always loved Diana, there was a period when he deeply cared for and helped her, a fact Diana was anxious to convey. Crucially, Diana did not want her children to believe that their parents had never loved each other. This desire is now directly contradicted by her brother's revelations, potentially creating distress for William and Harry.

Private Internet Access (PIA) is presented as an essential tool for online safety, with over 30 million users. A virtual private network (VPN) like PIA hides your IP address and encrypts data, protecting sensitive information like passwords and personal photos from hackers. This service is crucial given the amount of data users surrender to businesses and social media giants.

PIA VPN ensures users can access news and content even when it's censored, such as in instances like Canada's C18 bill. The service is compatible with Windows, macOS, Android, Linux, and iOS, allowing a single subscription to protect an unlimited number of devices. GB News viewers are offered an 83% discount, bringing the cost to under £2 a month, plus an extra four months free, with a 30-day money-back guarantee available at piavpn.com/gbnews.

Charles personally arranged for the Queen's Flight to retrieve Diana's body, bringing it back against internal royal family resistance. This contradicts the book's implication that Charles believed Diana would be quickly forgotten, suggesting instead that he was grief-stricken and sought to honor her publicly.

The controversial comment by King Charles, suggesting Diana would be forgotten, may have been made under fiery circumstances surrounding her burial. Charles wanted Diana to have a proper public burial, while Spencer preferred a quiet burial at Althorp. Charles's remark could have been an attempt to emphasize the need for a special tribute to prevent her from being forgotten in a few years, rather than a dismissive statement. The King likely believes his remark has been taken out of context, prompting the Palace's "recollections may vary" stance.

The release of Earl Spencer's book, which has significantly amplified the story, is widely believed to be motivated by financial reasons. Having been married four times, Spencer is speculated to be in need of money. This presumption suggests the book was always intended to be sensational to maximize its impact and profitability, which explains the dramatic revelations within its pages.

Princess Diana would be "extremely upset" by her brother's book, as it recounts her story, not his. She would particularly hate the remark made against her former husband, Charles, whom she always loved and considered "the one that got away." Most importantly, Diana's overriding concern was that her children, William and Harry, should never think their parents hadn't loved each other, a belief directly challenged by Spencer's narrative, leading to expert Ingrid Seward's belief that Diana would be absolutely furious.

Further revelations from Earl Spencer's book are anticipated, with expectations of "uncomfortable language" and continued criticism of Camilla. However, targeting Camilla is seen as unfair, as she is considered a "humble queen" who does not flaunt her position. To achieve sensationalism and generate significant sales, a book often needs to contain controversial material, regardless of its fairness.

Beyond King Charles, Mrs. Shand Kidd, Camilla's mother, also had an anti-royal stance during the period following Diana's death. This perspective, detailed in Ingrid Seward's book, reflects a broader sentiment of animosity towards the royal family from various quarters during that turbulent time. The controversy surrounding Spencer's book is expected to have far-reaching reverberations across the globe.

However, Harry's public statements often complicate his own life, potentially alienating more people. Despite this, Harry has historically been close to his father, making the dynamics complex and difficult to predict.

This comes at a sensitive time, as the King has an important meeting about AI scheduled at Dumfries House, highlighting that such controversies are an unwanted distraction. The continuous unfolding of this story is expected to run for some time, with more details to emerge.