King Charles 'Incandescent' Over Spencer's Claims

The memoir contains a series of allegations regarding King Charles's behavior, covering various aspects of his marriage to Princess Diana and the aftermath of her death. The claims aim to correct what Spencer perceives as historical untruths, despite facing criticism for their timing and potential motivations.

Spencer noted a stark contrast between Charles's tone and that of other callers, who were stunned and barely able to articulate their condolences. Charles reportedly informed Spencer that he had already informed William and Harry at Balmoral of their mother's passing.

A tense dispute arose between King Charles and Earl Spencer regarding the funeral procession protocol for Princess Diana. King Charles reportedly compared the situation to Lord Mountbatten's funeral, suggesting a precedent for walking behind the coffin. Spencer retorted, emphasizing that Mountbatten was not Charles's mother, leading to an alleged criticism from Charles about his family's 'sense of duty.'

This alleged comment caused Spencer to hang up the phone during their conversation. Reports indicate that royal officials subsequently pressured Prince William and Prince Harry to walk behind their mother's coffin to avoid public abuse toward Charles.

Earl Spencer states that Diana confided in a close friend that Charles told her he was very happy to marry her, but he was not actually in love with her. This alleged conversation followed Diana's discovery of a bracelet Charles had purchased for Camilla, and prior comments Charles allegedly made about Diana's weight, referring to her as 'a bit chubby.'

Earl Spencer recounts Princess Diana's private struggles with mental health, including a visit to Beachy Head where she contemplated suicide. Her love for her children ultimately prevented her from ending her life. Spencer also details how Diana personally informed him of her intent to divorce, conveying the news to her brother at the San Lorenzo restaurant, marking a significant step in the dissolution of her marriage.

New claims have emerged regarding Princess Diana's HRH title, with the Daily Mail revealing allegations from a new memoir. According to these reports, Queen Elizabeth II reportedly offered to restore Diana's HRH title on the day of her funeral. This claim is set to be featured on the front page of Friday's Daily Mail, stirring further debate about the royal family's actions and sentiments surrounding Diana's passing.

This system allows users to hold milligs of gold, branded as 'tally,' as their primary currency. Over the past 25 years, gold has demonstrated an average annual increase of over 11%, and its value against the pound has risen by 60% in just the last two years, offering a potentially more stable asset for users.

His reaction follows a previous statement that was described as forceful and unprecedented in its nature. Critics are referring to the current situation as 'Recollections May Vary 2.0,' but note that the current royal response is perceived as much stronger than previous statements on similar matters.

Earl Spencer's allegations extend to the late Queen, suggesting she 'cruelly stripped' Diana of her HRH title, an act Diana reportedly felt was vindictive. It is claimed that Lord Fellowes later notified Earl Spencer that the Queen realized the error in removing the title and wanted it restored. However, Earl Spencer allegedly refused the restoration on Diana's behalf, leading to ongoing questions about the motivations and consequences of these decisions.

Earl Spencer claims his motivation for releasing the memoir is to correct historical untruths ahead of the upcoming anniversary of Princess Diana's death, which is next summer. However, critics are speculating on the financial gain he might derive from the memoir and its serialization in the Daily Mail. This timing has led to questions about whether the revelations are primarily driven by a desire for historical accuracy or by personal and financial incentives.