Deceived by a Blind Daughter-in-Law? A Preposterous Revenge Story

Kishori Lal sought a wealthy daughter as a spouse for his son Raghav, one who would bring a large dowry. He was blinded by the prospect when the bride's father, Om Prakash, stated that his daughter was an only child and would inherit all his property.

Kishori Lal and his son, solely focused on the bride's wealth, went ahead with the marriage without confirming the face of the bride, Naina.

Kishori Lal encouraged his son Raghav to marry, saying, "You recognized it well. Just the daughter's wedding and all the property in her name. Dad, just say yes without seeing her. Where will you find such a good match again? We will be rich."

Raghav expressed his dissatisfaction to Naina, saying, "I didn't even see you before the wedding, and now if you don't even look at me with your eyes open, how will I feel good?"

The next morning, the parathas Naina cooked were only half-cooked and served at the table.

Naina explained to her father-in-law that she only cooked within the range she could see, stating, "I will only learn what I can see, father. Where I could see, I learned. And where I couldn't, it must have remained raw."

Kishori Lal expressed his dissatisfaction with Naina constantly wearing a long veil.

When Naina removed her veil, it was revealed that she had a visual impairment in one eye.

Kishori Lal and Raghav accused Om Prakash of 'fraud,' with Raghav exclaiming in anger, "Oh, what is this, Dad? Naina has one blind eye. Her name is Naina, but she turned out to be a dark daughter-in-law. I have been deceived."

Naina countered by pointing out that the groom's side had refused to check her face before the wedding.

Om Prakash warned that if the marriage was annulled, he would reclaim all previously endowed property and take half of his son-in-law's assets, stating, "Then if my daughter lives as a daughter-in-law in our house, your property will be entirely yours, and I will only take half of what I gave you."

The father-in-law mentioned property reclamation as insurance in case his son-in-law betrayed his daughter in the future.

When his son-in-law disparaged his daughter's appearance, the father-in-law retorted that his assets would also become 'half.'

Om Prakash said, "If you betray my daughter in the future, she must at least have something of her husband's. Now if you call my daughter 'Kani' (one-eyed), your wealth will also become 'Kani,'" revealing his intention to leave his daughter some assets from her husband.

The wife, Naina, deliberately scratched the car, causing an accident, and then used her vision problems as an excuse to embarrass her in-laws.

Her father-in-law, Om Prakash, used this as a pretext to reclaim an additional half of the son-in-law's property, saying, "Look, Raghav, now I will take half of the half of the property you possess. Because you chastised my daughter."

In the end, the son-in-law and father-in-law lost their wealth due to greed and were forced to maintain an unwanted marriage.