"Because of you, Kim Hyun-ji, it's ruined." Has Lee Jae-myung opened the gates of hell?

This is notable as it connects to issues of gender discrimination and human rights sensitivity within left-wing activist circles.

This controversy amplifies doubts about Representative Yong Hye-in's ideological background and her qualifications as a candidate for Minister of Gender Equality and Family, with the influence of Kim Ki-ro, chairman of the Korea Confederation of Trade Unions, also being mentioned.

Their relationship has spanned 22 years, and the specific content of the message 'I'll bring a lot of stuff' remains a question. The interpretation of what this message contained leaves room for controversy.

The host referred to this photo as a couple shot of "young lovers or very close friends or a married couple," emphasizing their intimacy. Furthermore, the fact that Yang Su-jin set this photo as her KakaoTalk profile picture and intimate message logs such as 'I miss you, it makes me cry' were disclosed, raising the possibility that their relationship went beyond a simple professional one.

Allegations were raised that clinical approval periods were shortened due to lobbying by Representative Kim Seung-won, leading to suspicions of stock manipulation at Sejong Medical. Immediately after approval, profits of 11.3 billion won, including 5 billion won from convertible bonds, were generated, but due to disqualification from animal testing and a stock crash, over 30,000 small shareholders suffered enormous losses. Lawsuits regarding this are still ongoing.

The whereabouts of the remaining 400 million won, excluding the 600 million won investment, need to be clarified, and the possibility that this money was 'parked' with Representative Kim Seung-won is also being discussed. The host urged a thorough investigation through a special prosecutor for this matter.

This is pointed out as a serious matter that should be handled by a special prosecutor, beyond the scope of the Representative Kim Seung-won related hearing.

A direct message of external pressure was caught to a working-level manager, stating, "The KFDA commissioner ordered to handle it properly so that no more complaints come from Kim Seung-won or Yang Su-jin's side." This suggests that there was undue instruction from above in the process of handling complaints related to Representative Kim Seung-won and Yang Su-jin.

This facility is said to have operated for nearly 7 years, earning over 300 million won and also receiving 1 million won in government vouchers. Even the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education was unaware of whether the facility was a school, drawing criticism as power-based corruption.

Suspicions were raised that they were received from within the prosecution, leading to a stance of reporting the matter to the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials. The Democratic Party is criticized for not claiming they didn't receive money, but for citing the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' principle, which states that illegally collected evidence lacks probative value, thus avoiding the clarification of substantive truth. This leads to the criticism that the Democratic Party is using the legality of evidence to cover up essential suspicions.

Critic Kwon Yeon-seo pointed out that from the photo, one should be able to identify who the president of a great nation is, but Kim Hye-kyung, seated centrally, could be mistaken for the president. This demonstrates the deficiencies in the Presidential Office's photo distribution system, and it was also noted that President Macron's gaze was directed at Kim Hye-kyung rather than Representative Lee Jae-myung.

Criticism was raised that the current government's diplomacy focuses solely on promotion without actual national interests. Critic Kwon Yeon-seo pointed out that there was no message about what benefits were gained for South Korea's national interest, giving the Lee Jae-myung administration's diplomacy a zero score. She criticized the lack of concrete achievements by referencing the Paris Baguette Copang case during the Park Geun-hye administration and argued that suspicions of it being an escape-style tour for approval ratings are inevitable.

Families of the missing criticized that the decision was made without a single substantial ground search being conducted. Despite the families providing walking search routes, they were not reflected, and discussions for dispatching a second team only began belatedly after the families' press conference.

Critic Kwon Yeon-seo emphasized that the government must act immediately in the situation where families of missing persons in Nepal are pleading through tears. Comparing it to the opposition party's offensive during the Sewol Ferry and Itaewon disasters, she pointed out that the current government avoids responsibility in incidents under its responsibility, such as the Muan Airport disaster. She asserted that the state must not abandon its citizens, and that the lives and safety of the people are the President's primary duty.

This statement reinforces the internal opposition within the Democratic Party to troop deployment. Concerns are also emerging about the weakening of the Lee Jae-myung administration's negotiating power with the US.

This internal opposition within the Democratic Party indicates that the Hormuz deployment may face difficulties passing in the National Assembly.

He argued that Korea should not be unilaterally dragged along by US demands. This came in the context of emphasizing the need for cautious diplomatic approach in the current situation, citing Representative Ahn Gyu-baek's past handling of nuclear weapons remarks.

Along with this, they are also trying to change the method of selecting the standing chairman to a system requiring National Assembly consent and presidential appointment. This is criticized as merely changing the signboard and an attempt to integrate the three powers. Concerns are raised that this could be interpreted as an intention to undermine the independence of the election commission and expand the influence of the ruling power.

This stance is based on a Realmeter survey showing 52.7% public support for abolishing early voting. This contrasts with former representative Lee Jun-seok's previous comments on early voting management issues, indicating a clear shift in the party's attitude towards the early voting system. The People Power Party strongly advocates for the abolition of early voting as a measure to resolve allegations of fraudulent elections and ensure the fairness of voting.