Living a Good Life: On Earth and in Space

Ambitious goals, such as sending people to the Moon or the International Space Station, often compel humanity to concentrate on solving complex problems. This focused attention can inadvertently lead to breakthroughs that address issues on Earth. Ariel Ekblaw affirmed that this reciprocal benefit is a core objective of contemporary space initiatives.

Many people mistakenly believe the common good involves finding the lowest common denominator, a simple compromise everyone can agree on. Meghan Sullivan argued that this approach is a significant error, drawing on ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle who believed the common good is a higher ideal to strive toward. The true common good requires defining a collective destination rather than settling for compromises based on current beliefs.

Ariel Ekblaw highlighted the need to define the common good within the context of vast geographical spaces, such as the near-Earth space environment. Currently, a clear 'space commons' with established standards and criteria does not exist. As space transitions from a void to a potential habitat, defining these shared principles becomes critical for its future governance and ethical development.

Ariel Ekblaw rejected the Hobbesian view that human life is inherently 'nasty, brutish, and short,' arguing instead that humans owe each other a higher standard. She suggested that people should strive to see the most honorable version of one another. This perspective emphasizes an obligation to uplift and recognize the best in others, moving beyond a cynical view of human nature.

Meghan Sullivan referenced philosopher Iris Murdoch, who advised that what people owe each other is the willingness to re-examine their perceptions. Murdoch noted that initial impressions are often inaccurate, estimating them to be 'quite stupid' 80 percent of the time. This philosophy encourages consciously avoiding the habit of categorizing individuals based on superficial stereotypes.

Meghan Sullivan proposed that if designing a better world from scratch, the principle of 'love thy neighbor' should be more rigorously enforced. Ariel Ekblaw, in turn, suggested the 'Golden Rule'—treating others as one wishes to be treated—as a foundational and essential principle, especially for confined space environments where cooperation is paramount. Both principles aim to establish a basic ethical framework for human interaction.

This effect often instills a sense of awe and responsibility for the planet. Democratizing access to low Earth orbit would allow more individuals to gain this unique perspective, potentially fostering a deeper collective appreciation for Earth.

Unlike other species, humans require substantial effort to develop into their best versions, a process that demands considerable attention not only from individuals but also from parents and teachers. She argued that distraction, rather than malicious intent, often hinders this vital growth and development.

Ariel Ekblaw explained that space exploration can significantly contribute to human flourishing by yielding benefits for life on Earth. She mentioned that space research could accelerate breakthroughs in treating diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's, as well as advancing organoid development and testing. The unique physical environment of orbit alters biological processes, opening new avenues for scientific discovery. Space exploration thus serves as a powerful catalyst, focusing collective attention and resources on solving pressing terrestrial problems in tangible, immediate ways.

She suggested a year of service for young people at age 18, envisioning programs that could bridge divides between urban and rural youth, as well as different political affiliations. Such service could encompass civilian-oriented initiatives like Teach for America, fostering shared experiences and a sense of collective purpose.

Meghan Sullivan discussed the decay of institutions crucial for shaping human character, specifically identifying education, religious organizations, and media. She expressed concern that the neglect of these foundational institutions leads to nihilism and a lack of communal identity. Sullivan emphasized the need to reinvest in these human-scale institutions and shared communal activities to combat increasing isolation and foster a stronger collective character.