Democratic Party Approval Rating Declines Amid Deepening Pro-Lee Myung-jae and Anti-Lee Myung-jae Factional Conflict

This is interpreted as a show of support for the Jang Dong-hyuk Supreme Council system. Park's attendance is seen as an attempt to strengthen internal party cohesion and rally support for future state affairs.

Those advocating for internal unity emphasize that outreach expansion should be achieved by strongly presenting agendas that resonate with public sentiment, centered on conservative values. Conversely, some criticized opponents of internal unity, labeling them as 'strategic simulations' by political commentators, revealing a critical perspective. This demonstrates the existence of diverse opinions regarding the party's future strategic direction.

The panelists dismissed this interpretation as closer to sophistry than rationality. The differing interpretations of the original meaning of the remark suggest the complex power dynamics within the party.

The host stated that despite a 3% decrease from the previous week, a figure of 42% was hard to believe. Panelists pointed out the limitations of telephone interview-based opinion polls and emphasized the need for fairer survey methods.

A fierce debate is unfolding within the Democratic Party surrounding former leader Yoo Si-min. This serves as a clear barometer of the conflict between the pro-Lee and anti-Lee factions within the Democratic Party. Even within the left-wing YouTube ecosystem, forces defending Yoo Si-min and those attacking him are divided and in opposition.

Panelist Lee Beom-seok predicted that the Democratic Party's internal division convention has begun and will last for at least a year. Accordingly, the People Power Party believes it is time to normalize its internal system and actively switch to an offensive stance on issues it has been hesitant about until now.

Panelist Jung Woo-jin suggested that a very intense level of public opinion warfare is needed, particularly strengthening new media-based public opinion warfare combined with youth. He added that the party should pursue dynamic changes with new figures over the next year and a half, maintaining a vigilant attitude.

According to a fair survey conducted by PenNMike (August 23-24), Lee Myung-jae's negative evaluation reached 60.9%. Notably, negative evaluations even surpassed positive evaluations among those in their 40s and 50s, who were considered key supporters. This is analyzed as a significant indicator showing that Lee Myung-jae's support base is shaking.

Panelist Lee Beom-seok emphasized that simply listing various issues will not reflect in approval ratings; instead, it is necessary to strike at the opponent's core weaknesses. He argued that by treating major issues like the infringement of suffrage as the first breakthrough and responding strongly from the outset, public opinion leadership can be secured.

He interpreted Lee Myung-jae's recent social media remarks on security as a sign of strong action. An analysis also suggested that the party might try to overcome the crisis by mobilizing organized groups such as the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions and the Korean Teachers and Education Workers' Union to incite anti-Japan sentiment.

The host reported that Rep. Jung Chung-rae criticized Rep. Kim Min-seok, saying that editing and only saying what one wants on social media is 'almost violent.' This incident is interpreted as evidence of the Democratic Party's failure to unite and the seriousness of its internal conflict.

Rep. Kim Min-seok, once known as the 'prince' of student activism, was scouted by former President Kim Dae-jung and held significant political value at a young age. However, after 20 years as an outsider, he returned and is now at the center of the power struggle within the Democratic Party. Recent actions, such as the launch of Democratic Party TV, have sparked controversy over the party's 'privatization'.

However, an analysis suggests that his position is unstable, as the Supreme Council is largely composed of pro-Jung Chung-rae lawmakers. Panelist Lee Beom-seok assessed that Rep. Jung Chung-rae would have received a much higher vote share if it weren't for preferential voting, and Rep. Kim's leadership crisis is deepening amidst the decline in the President's job approval rating.

The conservative bloc is attempting to discuss the spirit of the May 18th Gwangju Democratization Movement, raising the need for reinterpretation. Topics such as the absence of a South Korean historical perspective and the combination of Honam and Juche ideology were discussed at the New History National Movement forum. Panelist Lee Beom-seok criticized the Democratic Party's attitude of preventing any mention or discussion of 5.18 as 'political muzzling.' He argued that discussion and debate are even more necessary for the public to understand the meaning if the 5.18 spirit is to be enshrined in the constitution. Criticism was also raised that the Democratic Party's attitude is isolating 5.18.

Panelist Jung Woo-jin mentioned his experience serving as a translator officer in the department for wartime operational control transfer. He pointed out that Rep. Ahn Gyu-baek frequently requested documents related to wartime operational control at the time. Jung Woo-jin expressed doubts as to whether Rep. Ahn Gyu-baek had an intentional motive to create and expand the issue of wartime operational control. This raises questions about how the wartime operational control issue was utilized in the political sphere.

Panelist Lee Beom-seok urged active response, stating that a commander who does not pursue and destroy the enemy when the front line collapses is no commander. He also mentioned the importance of nurturing conservative youth talent, emphasizing the need to establish a human resource foundation for the future. This is interpreted as an important message indicating the future direction of the People Power Party.