Trump Admin Urged to Stop Electronic Voting Before Midterms

The host stated that the jury in Gaviola's case was allegedly not presented with all relevant facts, suggesting a potential bias from the judge during the proceedings.

She asserted that the jury in her trial was not permitted to hear crucial evidence, preventing them from understanding the full scope of the situation.

The host asserted that the federal government harbors as many criminals as there are individuals being prosecuted at the state level, particularly within the roles of prosecutors and judges. He claimed that federal court cases, especially those pertaining to election integrity, are often driven by ideological motives rather than objective legal principles, suggesting a systemic issue within the judicial branch.

She confirmed ongoing communication with various members of the Trump administration, indicating persistent engagement on these concerns.

Peters contended that many of the existing judicial and political problems originate from corrupt election processes. Her primary objective before the upcoming midterm elections is to eliminate all electronic voting systems, which she views as a critical step to address these issues.

Peters drew a comparison between electronic voting systems and drones that the FCC banned due to their use of Chinese parts. She referenced various governmental and cybersecurity organizations, including DHS, CISA, and MS-ISAC, as part of a broader discussion concerning the security of voting technology.

She also referenced the preservation of specific equipment from Fulton County, Pennsylvania, implying it holds evidence related to these claims.

Tina Peters stated she met with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for two and a half hours, along with her team, to discuss the issue. She claims to have communicated with President Trump directly, both through texts and other means, emphasizing the urgency of removing electronic voting machines. Peters also called for intervention from the Department of Justice and Department of Commerce to address these concerns.

She argued that this evidence of foreign chips contradicts previous assurances that these systems were not connected to the internet, raising further security concerns.

Peters claimed that numerous clerks have voiced concerns over automatic voter registration at DMVs, which allegedly inflates voter rolls. She noted that clerks in Michigan are demanding accountability from the state to clean up these rolls before elections, highlighting the need for accurate and secure voter registration processes.

Tina Peters characterized the alleged foreign infiltration of U.S. election systems as an act of war, citing Markwayne Mullin's reported statements about foreign parts. She claimed that foreign adversaries are actively influencing the selection of judges, governors, and secretaries of state through these compromised systems. Peters warned that if similar foreign interference occurred in any other context, it would unequivocally be considered an act of war, underscoring the severity of the threat.