CISA Tests Reveal Election Vulnerabilities

These assessments, initiated at the invitation of state officials, aimed to identify and address security weaknesses.

Peter Navarro reported that federal teams involved in these tests consistently achieved full network control of election systems within hours or days, indicating significant security gaps. Critical issues uncovered included vulnerabilities in firewalls, the presence of supposedly isolated equipment connected to broader networks, and persistent delays in applying essential software patches.

Navarro argues that this discrepancy points to a deeper issue of narrative control within government agencies, suggesting a 'deep state' influence that shapes public perception of election integrity despite documented vulnerabilities.

He describes a 'stuff the ballot box' strategy, detailing how the removal of signature verification requirements for absentee ballots, coupled with a dramatic increase in such ballots, altered election outcomes. Before 2020, Georgia experienced a 5% signature match failure rate, which, he claims, dropped to zero in 2020.

Navarro asserts that absentee ballots more than doubled in number and favored Biden by a ratio of more than two to one, directly impacting the election's outcome. He concludes that when these factors are mathematically combined, they more than account for Biden's 12,000-vote margin, suggesting a swing in favor of Trump.

He states that there is documented evidence indicating that Communist China acquired files containing information on millions of American voters and developed related capabilities to utilize this data.