In the appeal trial for the 2023 TheTamSa assault case, the first instance's acquittal was overturned, and a fine was imposed. NewTamSa raised issues with Mr. Jung Cheon-su's inconsistent testimony and the court's judgment procedure, announcing their intention to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The host questioned why other defendants received reduced sentences or mitigated charges while he alone was fined.
The host believes the fine was imposed based on claims of actions such as wrapping his arm around Mr. Jung Cheon-su's neck, and stated his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court to contest the unfairness of this ruling.
He initially described the situation with various expressions such as 'choked my neck,' 'pressed me down,' 'wrapped around,' and 'put me in a headlock.'
The first instance judge asked Mr. Jung Cheon-su why his statements kept changing, and Mr. Jung Cheon-su replied that after watching the video, he came to believe he had been subjected to such actions. Consequently, the first instance judge ruled for acquittal due to the lack of consistency in his statements.
This petition included content that had already been proven false in the first instance trial.
The host believes this petition influenced the second instance court's judgment and criticized the fact that content, whose credibility was already denied in the first instance, was again reflected in the ruling.
The host mentioned that the action to deter Mr. Jung Cheon-su, who had actually assaulted and injured a female staff member of TheTamSa, was considered defensive.
NewTamSa announced its intention to appeal to the Supreme Court, refusing to accept this appellate ruling. The host emphasized that they already have sufficient evidence to prove Mr. Jung Cheon-su's lies.
He expressed a strong will to definitely secure a remand from the Supreme Court to rectify the unfairness of this ruling. He showed confidence that proving Mr. Jung Cheon-su's testimony false would not be difficult.
In particular, it was criticized that Mr. Jung Cheon-su's recanted testimony, where he only claimed to have been grabbed by the neck after watching the video, was reflected in the ruling.
The host also questioned whether a fine of 200,000 won would be appropriate if joint assault were recognized, highlighting contradictions in the ruling.
The host emphasized that in trials, especially concerning guilt or innocence, the strict principle of evidence-based judgment must be observed. He argued that if the second instance court makes a different judgment based on evidence already assessed in the first instance, the defendant must be guaranteed the right to defense.
However, he pointed out that such a procedure was not carried out at all during this second instance trial, stating that this is a clear ground for appeal. He expressed confidence that if legal principles and conscience are alive, the Supreme Court will surely issue a remand.
The host reminded that Mr. Jung Cheon-su had stated in his first instance witness testimony, 'I wasn't injured physically, but my feelings were hurt.' This statement, he explained, played a decisive role in the first instance judge's acquittal on joint assault charges.
However, Mr. Jung Cheon-su has been claiming in broadcasts and petitions for severe punishment as if he was 'beaten to death,' which again criticizes the inconsistency of his testimony and statements. He emphasized that the actual physical harm was suffered by the female staff member assaulted by Mr. Jung Cheon-su.
Answers come from the transcript, with the exact spot cited.
Want the next article from 뉴탐사 NewTamsa?
When 뉴탐사 NewTamsa publishes, we'll write it up like the one you just read and email it to you.
뉴탐사 NewTamsa published 69 in the last 7 days.
