Democratic Party Protests People Power Party Speech

They added that after review by the National Election Commission, they plan to install reciprocal posts in the same manner. The People Power Party argued that criticizing the president is natural for Chairman Lee, and that he is deceiving the public with fraudulent pledges.

Furthermore, there were claims that the National Pension Service's rebalancing was not performed for six months prior to the local elections. Controversy is growing that over 6 trillion won was sold during the 14 trading days after the election, suggesting a possible political motive at a specific time.

They raised suspicions that the National Pension Service attempted to use the public's retirement funds for political purposes and demanded a thorough investigation into the truth.

The People Power Party demanded transparency in the selection process for 5·18 meritorious contributors and the public disclosure of their names. They stated that since tax money is involved, the selection process for contributors should be transparently revealed, and contributors should be publicly recognized as they are a source of pride. They also argued that the management authority for 5·18 meritorious contributors should be transferred from Gwangju City to the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, pointing out that the 10% bonus points for contributors cause fairness issues for the general public.

The speech by People Power Party floor leader Jeong Jeom-sik was condensed into keywords criticizing Chairman Lee Jae-myung: 'Hitler in politics, Chávez in economics, Putin in term limits.' The speech criticized Lee's pursuit of a constitutional amendment for re-election as Putin-style power succession and used neologisms like 'Jaem-demic' and 'National Cover-up Government' to intensely criticize the current government and the Democratic Party.

Suspicions were also raised that the investments were coerced by the government rather than stemming from companies' voluntary investment intentions. They also criticized that the project was being promoted without objective bidding procedures between local governments and quantifiable standards, claiming it should be subject to a special investigation.

The host argued that Lee's creation of adversarial targets and usurpation of popular sovereignty are similar to Hitler's path to power, pointing out that these actions deceive and divide the public.

Allegations have surfaced that Chairman Lee Jae-myung is attempting to abolish the crime of breach of trust and increase the number of Supreme Court justices to appoint individuals favorable to his agenda. This is interpreted as an attempt to neutralize the judicial system, with even the possibility of defying Supreme Court rulings through an appeal to the judiciary being mentioned. The People Power Party criticized these attempts as undermining judicial justice and violating the principle of separation of powers.

Recent public opinion poll results show an upward trend in the People Power Party's approval ratings. The host emphasized the importance of the overall trend rather than the numerical differences that may occur between different polling organizations, even within the margin of error. They pointed out that while the Democratic Party once held overwhelming support, its ratings have been consistently declining recently, evaluating the People Power Party's rising approval ratings as a significant change.

The host warned of the dangers of populist economic policies by referencing Venezuela, a country that once had the world's largest oil reserves but saw its economy collapse due to the Chávez regime's nationalization and excessive spending policies. They pointed out that such policies can push a nation's economy into an unmanageable situation during oil price declines, ultimately devastating the lives of its citizens.

Such actions are raising serious concerns about the government's fiscal soundness, and the host expressed a critical view of the government's logic for refusing to repay national debt. It is being pointed out that increasing debt even with high tax collection is an irresponsible act that shifts the burden to future generations.