9/11 Families Allege Betrayal on 25th Anniversary

They claim evidence was withheld, the JASTA legislation was vetoed, and both public and private promises were broken.

They urge President Trump to demand honesty from Saudi officials, highlighting a consistent pattern of what they describe as betrayal after betrayal over the past quarter-century.

Investigators state that a warning from Mossad prior to 9/11 was non-specific and general. It is theorized that the lack of specificity may have been an effort to protect intelligence sources and methods.

A congressional inquiry is planned to investigate these claims further, seeking to understand the balance between intelligence protection and actionable warnings.

Steve Bannon criticized Condoleezza Rice’s presence at the memorial, identifying her as a representative of the 'uniparty' that contributed to the nation's current predicament. Bannon argues that the elite establishment misled the public about the War on Terror and nation-building efforts.

This perspective frames President Trump's actions as a rejection of previous political eras, seeking to dismantle the influence of long-standing political structures.

The core issue, according to reports, stemmed from associations with figures like Hassan Per Ramsey Cassm, the chief legal counsel to the mayor’s office, who represented individuals linked to Al-Qaeda.

David Zir reported that critics also highlighted Mdani’s wife’s past social media posts as problematic, contributing to a sentiment among attendees that some figures represented a 'wolf in sheep's clothing.' This distinction between religious identity and ideological associations was central to the controversy.

Attendees expressed discomfort with what they viewed as an infiltration of the memorial by individuals whose affiliations raised questions about their respect for the victims and the gravity of the event.

The disruption of oil flow in the Red Sea is escalating, coinciding with severely depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserves and global stockpiles. This situation is driving fuel price spikes, which are becoming inevitable due to the lack of shock absorbers in the system.

EJ Antony suggests that the timing of these price increases might be more political than religiously based, potentially aligning with midterm election cycles. Given diesel’s critical role as the essential lifeblood of the US and global economy, such price surges could have significant political implications.

This scenario creates a volatile economic landscape where fuel costs are directly linked to broader political agendas and the state of global supply chains.

Every grocery item on the shelf, for instance, relies on trucks fueled by diesel for transportation.

EJ Antony emphasizes that price increases for the coming months are already 'baked into the cake' due to these rising diesel costs, indicating an unavoidable upward trend in consumer goods prices.

Several gas stations in California have reached their maximum pump price of $9.99 per gallon. This reflects a national trend where every state in the US is experiencing record-high diesel prices compared to the previous year.

Despite these surging costs, demand for fuel remains steady, indicating consumers' essential reliance on these resources.

Oil is considered highly inelastic, meaning consumers continue to purchase it until prices reach an extreme breaking point. This inelasticity contributes to dramatic price increases before any significant demand destruction occurs.

Global oil reserves are being rapidly depleted, exacerbating the supply shortage. Since supply cannot be easily increased in the short term, the market forces prices upward to eventually reduce demand.

Steve Bannon has scheduled a follow-up interview for early next week to discuss President Trump’s remaining economic policy tools. The discussion will focus specifically on the options available to Trump concerning the energy crisis.

This upcoming conversation aims to explore potential executive actions and strategies to address the escalating fuel prices and their broader economic impact.

This military buildup underscores international efforts to protect critical trade routes.

The United States is also contributing military support, including the USS Boxer and a Florida National Guard battalion stationed in Djibouti. Neil McCabe noted that the French are taking 'absolute action' to safeguard the Suez Canal trade route, emphasizing the strategic importance of the area.

This theory suggests a symbolic connection to historical conflicts.

David Zir acknowledged that he has heard this claim from experts but could not independently confirm its accuracy, leaving the potential link speculative.

Bannon questioned the appropriateness of their behavior at such a somber event.

He further mused about how the nation's founders would react to the current political climate and the conduct of modern leaders, implying a disconnect from historical reverence.

Metaxas argued that contemporary left-wing politicians, specifically citing Mandani and AOC, are more 'despicable' than the enemies faced during the American Revolution 250 years ago. He asserted that no adversary from that historical period was as contemptible as current political opponents.

He called on the public to actively stand against ideologies he labels as 'satanic' and 'false,' emphasizing the need for vigilance. Metaxas warned against being 'soft and naive' when confronting these perceived ideological threats, urging a more resolute stance.

Bannon argued that such rhetoric fails to acknowledge the complex realities of global conflicts.

He categorized current threats not as religious, but as forms of 'ideological submission,' contrasting this modern geopolitical view with a more historical and pragmatic understanding of power dynamics.

Eric Metaxas claimed to have inspected Alexander Hamilton’s pistols, which he said were used at Redoubt 10 during the Battle of Yorktown. He described the experience as seeing 'one of the most unbelievable things I've ever seen,' valuing the artifacts at around $5 million.

Metaxas used this encounter to emphasize that history is a tangible reality, not merely a collection of stories. He argued that such artifacts serve as concrete proof of past events and the heroism of historical figures.

This perspective underscores the importance of physical evidence in understanding and appreciating historical narratives, grounding them in verifiable reality.

He believes that tangible connections to the past can profoundly impact one's understanding of historical truth and national heritage.

He described this alleged action as 'despicable,' suggesting a deliberate attempt to suppress his work.

Metaxas is now considering organizing a boycott of Barnes & Noble in response to what he perceives as censorship. He speculates that political motivations are behind the alleged suppression, believing the bookstore is deliberately making his book difficult to find.

This accusation highlights ongoing tensions between authors and retailers regarding book placement and visibility, especially for works with perceived political or ideological leanings.

Metaxas called on his audience to avoid purchasing his book from Barnes & Noble, advocating for alternative retailers in light of the alleged actions.