중국 해경, 필리핀 선박과 충돌

So, a maritime confrontation in the West Philippine Sea has once again drawn international attention after a China Coast Guard vessel collided with a Philippine government fishery ship during a mission intended to provide fuel assistance to Filipino fishermen.

The incident took place on Friday, September 18th, 2026, roughly 54 nautical miles off the coast of Paloan. The Philippine vessel involved was the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources ship BRP2 Maggot Salamont, also known as MMO 315. The Chinese

vessel involved was China Coast Guard ship CCG 21585. According to the Philippine Coast Guard, the BRP Datu Maggot Salomat had been conducting a maritime patrol and fuel subsidy operation for Filipino fishermen working in the West Philippine Sea. Philippine authorities said the

encounter occurred around 6.36 nautical miles northn northwest of Abad Santos Shaw internationally known as Bombay Shaw and approximately 54 nautical miles

location lies well within the Philippines exclusive economic zone. Philippine officials also released a detailed account of the moments leading up to the collision. At around 11:04 in the morning, the Philippine Coast Guard said CCG 21585 crossed behind the BAR

vessel, passing its stern at a distance of only about 10 m. Despite the extremely close maneuver, the Philippine vessel continued along its course. Around 9 minutes later, at approximately 11:13 a.m., Philippine authorities said the Chinese Coast Guard vessel carried

out another close maneuver. This time, the two ships made physical contact. Rear Admiral J. Tariela, spokesperson of the Philippine Coast Guard for the West Philippine Sea, said Philippine authorities believe the incident was deliberate rather than an accidental

collision. Tiela said the China Coast Guard deliberately rammed a civilian government vessel on a humanitarian and livelihood mission. Video released by Philippine authorities shows the two vessels o parading at extremely close

footage, members of the Philippine crew can reportedly be heard warning one another to brace as the ships move dangerously close together. The collision caused visible structural damage to the BRP Datu Mag Salomat. Photographs released by the Philippine

Coast Guard showed bent and broken railings, damaged metal supports and stansions, displaced equipment, and debris scattered across sections of the vessel. Despite that damage, Philippine authorities said no crew members were injured. The Philippine Coast Guard also

said the confrontation did not immediately end after the collision. According to Manila's account, CCG 21585 later passed directly behind the Philippine fisheries vessel at a

important part of the Philippines argument that the collision was not simply the result of an unavoidable maritime accident. The Philippine Department of Four IG affairs strongly condemn the conduct attributed to the China Coast Guard. The department

emphasized that the Philippine ship involved was a civilian government law enforcement vessel conducting a mission in support of Filipino fishermen and was not engaged in a military deployment. The DFA said there is no justification for the CCG vessel to undertake

aggressive actions against a Philippine civilian law enforcement vessel. Philippine authorities described the mission as a routine and lawful humanitarian operation. They also argued that the conduct of the Chinese vessel was inconsistent with international

maritime obligations. Manila cited several legal frameworks in support of its position including the United Nations convention on the law of the sea or UN slows the 1972 international regulations for preventing collisions at sea, the 1974 safety of life at sea

convention and the 2016 South China Sea arbitral award. The national task force for the West Philippine Sea issued a similar statement. It said the Philippine vessel had been carrying out a lawful civilian operation aimed at supporting the livelihoods of Filipino

fishermen. The task force said Philippine government missions in the area would continue while also calling for restraint, professionalism, and respect for international law. The location of the incident is especially important to Manila's position. Under

Yuan Close, coastal states may generally

China rejected the arbitration process and continues to reject the tribunals's ruling. Beijing has also disputed Manila's account of the September 18th collision. According to the China Coast Guard, its vessel was conducting what Beijing described as rights protection

and law enforcement operations in waters near Shian Ben Xiao, China's name for Sabina or Iscod Shaw. Chinese authorities presented a very different account of how the collision occurred. According to Beijing, the Philippine ship ignored repeated warnings before

changing course and accelerating across the bow of the Chinese Coast Guard vessel. China said that maneuver caused the collision. China Coast Guard spokesperson Gianlu maintained that the Chinese vessel operated in what Beijing described as a professional,

standardized, and lawful manner. The Chinese side said the Philippine vessel bears full responsibility for the incident. The two governments therefore continue to present sharply conflicting accounts. Manila says CCG 21585

maneuvers around the BRP Datu Mag Salamat before making contact with the Philippine vessel while it maintained its course. Beijing on the other hand says the Philippine ship ignored Chinese warnings before moving across the bow of the China Coast Guard vessel. Video

released by Philippine authorities Stardy has become an important part of Manila's presentation of the incident. The footage shows both vessels operating at extremely close range and also documents the physical damage sustained

publicly disputed between the two governments. The incident also drew responses from countries outside the Philippines and China. The United States was among those responding publicly. US ambassador to the Philippines Lee Lipton said, "We strongly cond the China coast

guard's deliberate ramming of the Philippine BAR vessel near Bombay Shaw." He also praised the professionalism shown by Philippine personnel during the confrontation. Canada expressed similar concern. The Canadian embassy in Manila said it was troubled by what it

described as the deliberate ramming of a Philippine Fisheries Enforcement vessel. Canada also warned that dangerous maritime maneuvers could threaten peace and stability in the region. The European Union also responded to the incident. EU ambassador to the

Philippines, Masimo Santoro, emphasized the risks created when government vessels operate dangerously close to one another at sea. Santoro said dangerous maneuvers at sea endangers lives. He also highlighted the importance of glows in the 2016 Arbitrol Award in supporting

maritime security and safety. Those international responses transformed what

diplomatic issue. Maritime safety quickly became one of the central concerns. There is also another important part of the story. The BRP Datu Magad Salamad had already encountered difficulties just one day before the collision. On September 17th,

the vessel ran ground near Hassahasa Shaw, internationally known as Half Moon Shaw. According to the Philippine Coast Guard, the vessel had been approaching a group of around 15 to 20 Filipino fishing boats to distribute fuel under the government's Kadiwa Parasa Bagong

baiting Mangayabai program fishing vessels initially attempted to pull the ship free. However, low tide and the limited towing capacity of the smaller boats prevented them from successfully refloating the government vessel. Philippine Coast Guard personnel later

assisted in freeing the BER ship, allowing it to continue its operations. The following day, the same vessel became involved in the confrontation with China Coast Guard ship CCG 21585. Philippine officials have repeatedly emphasized the civilian nature of the

mission. According to Manila, the BRP Datu Maggot Salomat was not participating in any combat deployment. Its stated purpose was to deliver subsidized fuel and livelihood support to Filipino fishermen operating in waters west of Palawan. That distinction

is significant because the confrontation involved civilian government personnel working aboard a fisheries enforcement vessel rather than a Philippine Navy warship. Following the collision, Philippine Coast Guard comma Dant

the BRP Datue Maggot Salamat and ensure the safety of everyone aboard. The September 18th confrontation also demonstrates how quickly routine maritime operations in the South China Sea can escalate into serious diplomatic disputes. A separation of only 10 meters

between large vessels already provides very little room for error. A distance of roughly 5 meters as Philippine authorities reported during the maneuver that followed the collision leaves even less margin. Fortunately, no injuries were reported in this incident, but

photographs showing broken railings, twisted support structures, and displaced equipment illustrate the physical danger crews face when large government ships maneuver at such close distances. For Manila, the confrontation has reinforced its strategy of

documenting and publicly releasing incidents in the West Philippine Sea. Philippine authorities argue that greater transparency allows both the public and foreign governments to observe how vessels behave during encounters in disputed waters. Beijing

presents the situation very differently. Chinese authorities maintain that Philippine government vessels repeatedly enter waters claimed by China and that China Coast Guard ships are carrying out lawful enforcement activities in those areas. Those competing legal and

political positions remain unresolved. What can be established is that on September 18th, 2026, China Coast Guard vessel CCG 21585 and the Philippine fishery ship BRP.2 Maggot Salomat came into physical contact during a Philippine fuel assistance mission

approximately 54 nautical miles from