Democratic Party's Lee Jae-myung System Becomes a Point of Contention

Kim Ki-heung, People Power Party media spokesperson, raised suspicions about the relationship between Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung and semiconductor companies, strongly advocating for a parliamentary hearing. He mentioned allegations that the government first selected semiconductor sites and then handed them over to companies, pointing out that the possibility of Leader Lee Jae-myung's pressure influencing corporate management in this process cannot be ruled out.

Spokesperson Kim demanded the attendance of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong and SK Chairman Chey Tae-won as witnesses at the hearing. He stated that their attendance is expected to reveal the full extent of the semiconductor site selection allegations and prevent and deter future undisclosed pressure from power on corporations.

Kim Ki-heung, People Power Party media spokesperson, mentioned that Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong or SK Chairman Chey Tae-won could face embezzlement charges if they made investment decisions based on political considerations. He explained that corporate heads making investment decisions based on political considerations rather than their independent judgment could be an act against shareholders' interests.

Spokesperson Kim also claimed that the Democratic Party's attempt to delete the crime of embezzlement is an attempt to address both Leader Lee Jae-myung's judicial risks and the interests of the business community simultaneously. This statement further highlights suspicions that Leader Lee Jae-myung and the Democratic Party are trying to exert undue influence on corporate management.

He argued that while normal party operations include basic TFs or committees, such an excessive establishment of organizations could be interpreted as the party leader's intention to place his own people.

Spokesperson Kim analyzed that Leader Lee Jae-myung might be deluded into thinking they are 'his people' when handing out appointment letters, but this stems from impatience. He viewed it as an attempt to disregard the Democratic Party's existing party structure and strengthen his own influence, warning that such an approach could lead to problems in party operations in the long run.

Kim Ki-heung, People Power Party media spokesperson, strongly criticized the Democratic Party's official announcement to launch 'Democratic Party TV' and its plan to benchmark Kim Eo-jun's YouTube channel. Spokesperson Kim claimed that this is tantamount to the party leader publicly declaring an intention to promote fake news, and that it would essentially become 'government-controlled broadcasting'.

He expressed concern that Democratic Party TV would fail to perform its function of objective criticism or commentary, instead devolving into a platform solely for the party's unilateral announcements and propaganda. This is interpreted as a criticism that it would lose the media's essential role of monitoring and checking, and only serve the interests of a specific political party.

Kim Ki-heung, People Power Party media spokesperson, raised his voice in criticism of the controversy surrounding Democratic Party lawmakers' '90-degree bows'. He referred to the ongoing criticism of Representative Kim Min-seok's 'order for 90-degree bows', pointing out that it is inappropriate for those who espouse democracy to engage in 'gangster-style bows'.

Spokesperson Kim strongly criticized Representative Kim Min-seok's claim that the 90-degree bows were ordered out of 'respect for the people', stating that in reality, they are betraying and deceiving the public. He dismissed such bows as mere performative political acts, not stemming from genuine respect.

This controversy is leading to criticism within the political sphere regarding formal attitudes and insincere actions, and is sparking a societal debate on what true respect for the people entails.