Middle East Conflicts Escalate, 9/11 Saudi Ties Probed

The United States remains committed to economically isolating Iran, even as regional diplomatic efforts, such as Omani-Iranian agreements, suggest a potential opening of waterways. U.S. policy explicitly aims to prevent Iranian oil exports.

The White House's perspective on regional warming is described as a mixed bag, as Washington continues to enforce its blockade regardless of these new regional understandings. The overarching goal of the U.S. is to isolate Iran as much as possible, including blocking its shipping.

If China resumes substantial oil purchases, its increased demand will exert upward pressure on the global market.

This surge in demand, following a period of reduced Chinese consumption due to economic factors, could lead to higher prices worldwide. Such price increases would likely force other nations to reduce their oil consumption.

Guest noted that "if it starts to purchase oil again, if his demand comes back into the market, then that will be an upward pull on oil prices."

Steve Bannon warned of a potential merger of these fronts, encompassing areas of Turkish interest, Iran, and Kurdish regions. This perspective frames the current geopolitical landscape as a rapidly metastasizing conflict that could involve major regional powers.

Bannon stated, "you're in the kinetic part of the third world war unless you can stop it. And you may have the merger of the Ukrainian front and the Gaza front uh and what the Turks want to do and now in the Persian Gulf in Iran and the Kurds and now spreading all the way to the Saudi Peninsula and all the way to the Red Sea."

This historical clash, featuring Jan Sobieski and the Polish Hussars against the Ottoman Turks, is used to frame contemporary conflicts as a "civilizational conflict."

Jack Posobiec asserted that the mindset of a civilizational conflict is identical to that observed during the Ottoman Empire's advances into Christian Europe. This viewpoint suggests that current geopolitical struggles are not merely political but represent a deeper clash of civilizations.

Furthermore, the discussion positioned energy supplies as a primary theater of this perceived conflict, indicating that control and access to energy resources are central to the broader struggle. Posobiec noted, "today is the anniversary of the Battle of Vienna, 1683, September 12th, Janobies and the 3,000 Polish Hassars. And let me and I'll tell you something right now. When the Ottoman Turks were marching across Christian Europe back then, they had the exact same mindset that we are in a civilizational conflict."

Terry, a representative for 9/11 victims, stated that no presidential administration has ever been a friend to their cause. This sentiment extends from the Bush administration, accused of burying evidence related to the attacks, through subsequent presidencies.

The Obama administration notably fought against the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), while the Trump administration allegedly used state secrets to block access to relevant documents. Despite promises, the Biden administration has also failed to address evidence linking Saudi Arabia to the 9/11 attacks. Terry concluded, "No, not at all. None of them have ever been a friend to us."

Obama initially vetoed the legislation, which allows U.S. citizens to hold state sponsors of terrorism accountable.

Terry recounted that 9/11 families had to appeal to Congress to override the veto. Congress ultimately did so, marking a significant moment of legislative pushback against the executive branch. Terry stated, "He [Obama] vetoed the bill and we had to go back to Congress and ask them to please override the veto as best they could. They did and it was the first and one and only veto override of his entire presidency."

Terry urged MBS "that enough is enough and that they have to stop lying and that they have to come to terms with what happened in their country."

The families are demanding that the Saudi kingdom cease lying about its alleged involvement in 9/11 and take action to clean up extremist programs operating within the U.S. They also seek the exposure of state-funded channels that have allegedly supported al-Qaeda. These demands are part of a broader push to bring justice to the victims and their families by confronting the Saudi government's role.

The video features experts from the FBI and CIA who provide evidence supporting this link.

Terry noted, "I just produced a 2 and a half minute video that really condenses and you'll see the Saudi connection and there's experts on there, FBI, CIA experts that will say there's peace. So, it's www.911familiesunited.org." This resource is intended to make complex evidence more accessible to the public and provide families with documentation regarding the Saudi government's alleged involvement.

Jack Posobiec referenced the 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report that were initially classified and contained details about Saudi ties.

Specifically, he highlighted that two of the 9/11 attackers rented a room in San Diego from an individual tied to a Saudi program known as the Moya program, under the Ministry of Islamic Affairs. This program, according to Posobiec, suggests that Saudi-funded initiatives were actively supporting elements connected to the attackers across Western countries.

These points reinforce the belief among 9/11 families and some commentators that Saudi Arabia played a more direct role in the attacks than publicly acknowledged.

The demand for disclosure underscores the ongoing pressure on the kingdom to confront historical allegations and provide answers to the victim's families.

He stated, "I don't think I've ever seen a more dangerous time. I think this is more dangerous than the run-up to World War II."

This assessment suggests a profound concern about the escalating conflicts and geopolitical tensions worldwide. Bannon also warned of a potential 50-year conflict originating from the 9/11 attacks, indicating a long-term perspective on ongoing global instability.

The discussion emphasized the need for hemispheric defense, advocating for a focus on securing U.S. borders and interests rather than engaging in extensive military interventions in the Middle East. This strategic shift suggests a reevaluation of traditional foreign policy approaches in light of current threats.

Additionally, allegations were made that then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld sought to link the 9/11 attacks to Iraq on the very day of the attacks. This claim suggests an early and intentional effort to shape the narrative and justify military action, further undermining confidence in past administrations' decisions.

He asserted, "They view this as a civilizational fight. We don't. And so the thing we need to do is to stop committing suicide of our own civilization."

Posobiec claimed that mass migration is an attempt to alter American demographics, suggesting a deliberate effort to fundamentally change the country's composition. This perspective frames the issue as an existential threat, urging a halt to what he describes as the "suicide of our own civilization."

He highlighted that "15 of the 19 hijackers were were Saudi nationals," emphasizing the direct link between the kingdom and the perpetrators.

Kennedy asserted that the attacks could not have occurred without assistance from Saudi intelligence, suggesting a deeper level of involvement than officially acknowledged. He specifically blamed the Bush administration and subsequent administrations for this lack of accountability, indicating a systemic failure to pursue justice.

Kennedy stated, "I was describing to them how we never held the Saudis to account and that was um that was the fault of the Bush administration and successive administrations. 15 of the 19 hijackers were were Saudi nationals." This critique underscores the persistent belief among some that Saudi Arabia has evaded responsibility for a major terrorist event on U.S. soil.

He stated, "Here's what I tell them. Tough break for a swell guy. We got Mexico. We got the Gulf of America. We're going to frack PMX's uh the Mexican oil fields."

Bannon highlighted the vast domestic energy potential in North America, including Mexico, Guyana, and Pennsylvania, suggesting that the U.S. should prioritize developing these resources. This approach, he argued, would reduce reliance on foreign oil and diminish the perceived need for military intervention in the Middle East to secure energy routes like the Suez Canal.

His stance reflects a broader call for the U.S. to prioritize its own national interests and resource development over commitments to foreign nations' security.

His goal is to emphasize that America is fundamentally built on good values and foundations, encouraging a return to shared national principles rather than focusing on internal strife.

This perspective frames contemporary political disagreements not as standard partisan divides, but as a battle for the very existence and values of the United States.

He asserted that the U.S. must prioritize its own interests over international stability pacts.

The panelist stated, "With all those nations we should we should be declaring our independence from them we have our interests we're going to make sure our interests are served but it's not our job to make to uh to guarantee the security of Saudi Arabia." This stance challenges the traditional role of the U.S. as a global security provider.

He interpreted Donald Trump's approach to foreign policy as a strategic effort to allow the U.S. to "run the show" and dictate its own terms on the international stage, rather than being bound by long-standing alliances or obligations.

Despite these efforts, Gil described the Houthi fighters as extremely resilient due to their home territory advantage. He stated, "It's the problem is it's that's their territory. That's their home." This terrain advantage, he argued, has led to the failure of Saudi-led efforts.

Gil also noted the ongoing strain of American military involvement in the region, suggesting that continued intervention is unsustainable and ineffective against a deeply entrenched and adaptable adversary. This analysis underscores the challenges of modern asymmetric warfare.

Customers can use the promo code "labor" at checkout to receive 20% off any one-time order.

Comstock stated, "We are extending the Labor Day discount uh through today. So, you can still use code labor at checkout for 20% off any one-time order just through today." The promotion focuses on their NAD+ product, which includes CoQ10, designed to boost cellular energy and support heart health.

The company claims that users of their supplements report an uptick in vitality and overall energy levels. This extension provides a final opportunity for customers to purchase their products at a discounted rate.