£12 Billion Annual Spending on Migrant Benefits
Carol Malone described the current welfare system as "obscene" and "unsustainable" for taxpayers, arguing that Britain's welfare state should exist primarily for its citizens rather than migrants.
A GB News panel debates the sustainability and fairness of the UK's welfare system amidst rising costs for foreign nationals.
Carol Malone described the current welfare system as "obscene" and "unsustainable" for taxpayers, arguing that Britain's welfare state should exist primarily for its citizens rather than migrants.
The total Universal Credit figure has reportedly increased by £3 billion since 2024, raising concerns about the system's long-term viability.
Critics estimate that 3.6 million people are under no obligation to work for the rest of their lives, while a workforce of 34 million taxpayers struggles to sustain support for global claimants, leading Christys to call for an end to the UK acting as the "benefits office to the world."
Don’t miss the next video from this channel
When a new video goes live, we’ll turn it into an easy-to-read article like this and email it to you.
He referenced a GB News report indicating a single earner needs a £71,000 salary to match the benefits received by a non-working family of three, arguing that working families expect those on benefits to be poorer than themselves and criticizing politicians for failing to implement concrete solutions.
They asserted that the only way to reduce the overall benefit bill is through strong government action, such as limiting or eliminating benefits for migrants, a sentiment echoed by the host who stated that Britain is "broken" due to high welfare spending.
A speaker criticized former Home Office officials for complaining about benefit figures that increased during their tenure, suggesting a lack of accountability.
The 11.9 billion pound figure was challenged as misleading, with the argument that it refers to households with a foreign national rather than direct payments exclusively to foreign nationals, citing personal family background to highlight the complexity of household benefit claims.
The host, Patrick Christys, posed a fundamental question about whether the state should pay benefits to individuals who have entered the country but have not contributed.
The discussion then moved to the eligibility for 'leave to remain' and the potential for a two-year waiting period before migrants can claim benefits.
The debate further explored whether long-term workers who have paid National Insurance for decades deserve state support, irrespective of their nationality.
A speaker noted that asylum seekers arriving by small boats receive approximately £40 a week for basic necessities, emphasizing the minimal nature of this support.
However, the host challenged the prevailing narrative that immigration is a "boon for the economy," labeling it a "catastrophic drain" and shifting the discussion to whether long-term residents should be denied benefits, such as Universal Credit, during severe health crises like cancer.
Answers come from the transcript, with the exact spot cited.
Want the next video from GBNews too?
When GBNews publishes, we'll write it up like the one you just read and email it to you.
GBNews published 154 in the last 7 days.
We skip Shorts.
French Vessels Allegedly Escorting Migrant Boats to UK WatersGBNews2 hours ago · 16:56 · 1.8K views · Created 2 hours ago
Jacob Rees-Mogg Criticizes UK Defence SpendingGBNews4 hours ago · 10:39 · 888 views · Created 3 hours ago
'LUNACY' Michael Gove RAGES over institutional SKIVINGGBNews5 hours ago · 13:33 · 392 views · Created 4 hours ago