Analysis suggests that the forced adoption of Kim Seung-won's confirmation report for Minister of Justice will weaken the Lee Jae-myung administration's momentum for state affairs.
During the adoption process, People Power Party lawmakers protested and walked out, strongly opposing it. Criticism arose that despite overwhelmingly high public opposition to the appointment, it was forcibly adopted, disregarding public sentiment.
Due to controversies surrounding nominees like Kim Seung-won and Kang Shin-cheol, even within the far-left, embarrassment and concern are being expressed. Amid anxiety that Lee Jae-myung's approval rating will drop further, criticism of the Lee Jae-myung administration is increasing on online communities and social media. This is leading to a trend of withdrawing support due to disappointment related to personnel matters, with supporters gradually cutting ties.
They criticized the Lee Jae-myung administration and the Democratic Party for being preoccupied with avoiding responsibility for the disaster. The bereaved families held a one-person protest in front of the National Assembly, expressing anger at the indifference of the government and the ruling party. They are conveying their heartfelt pleas, including an awakening of the Lee Jae-myung administration and the Democratic Party, and a demand for truth-finding.
Various allegations of corruption and embezzlement have emerged during the operation of the social cooperative. In particular, there are growing suspicions, revealed by Assemblyman Joo Jin, of collusion with the government in the process of selecting a specific cooperative for government support, ousting other social cooperatives. Transparency issues have been raised, comparing it to the case of Assemblywoman Yoon Mi-hyang, and public anger at emotional manipulation through tears is growing.
This trend is even compared to 'rats' escaping a sinking ship.
Analysis suggests that the continued push for appointment, similar to the Moon Jae-in presidency and the Cho Kuk scandal, could backfire. The repercussions are so significant that the possibility of impeachment is being raised if the appointment is forced.
This is criticized as a potential exploitation for political gain, where they would take the lead in demanding the nominee's resignation after the forced appointment. Criticism continues that it is tantamount to condoning the Lee Jae-myung administration's manipulation of the Ministry of Justice without a substantive strategy for the nominee's resignation.
Analysis suggests that if negative public opinion widens to 4 to 1, supporters will have no choice but to remain silent. This increases the likelihood of the support base losing cohesion and defecting, which could lead to a weakening of the Lee Jae-myung administration's momentum for state affairs.
Even during his time as the Democratic Party leader, it is believed that every time Lee Jae-myung spoke, it negatively impacted approval ratings. At a time when decisive moves such as changes in state policy, withdrawal of charges, and giving up re-election are needed, there is a high possibility that he will lean towards evasive messages and shifting responsibility to working-level officials.
It is pointed out that there are strong suspicions of speculative investment in special allocations in redevelopment areas, which would be impossible without prior information. Although the nominee explained that he 'didn't know due to the war,' public criticism is growing even stronger. Such controversies severely damage the nominee's integrity.
This is interpreted as exposing internal conflict within the ruling party over the right to nominate the head of the Central Investigation Agency. Former Assemblywoman Choo's remarks are seen as expressing dissatisfaction within the party regarding Lee Jae-myung's leadership, while also signaling the beginning of the next power struggle.
Analysis suggests that intra-party figures are attacking the current power to gain indirect benefits to become the next power. This is criticized as a despicable act to elevate one's own standing rather than adhering to the spirit of 'prioritizing the party over self.' As internal party conflicts surface, Lee Jae-myung's leadership is further shaken.
Although Kim Eo-jun explained that he was 'concerned,' the conflict with the support base is intensifying. This incident is regarded as a clear example of the cracks within the strong support base for the Lee Jae-myung administration.
If attempts at internal purges continue while Lee Jae-myung's support base is weak, party division is bound to intensify. Such factional conflicts are expected to continue to burden the Lee Jae-myung administration's state management.
This is interpreted as an intention to emphasize active political participation, such as joining the People Power Party, while also highlighting controversial figures to stimulate public opinion.
This attitude shows a critical stance on national security posture, and claims are being made that he is unsuitable as Minister of National Defense. Criticism poured in that it is a serious problem for a Defense Minister, who is responsible for national security, not to clearly define the concept of the main enemy. Such controversies could expand into questions about the nominee's qualifications and his views on security.
Answers come from the transcript, with the exact spot cited.
Want the next article from 펜앤마이크TV?
When 펜앤마이크TV publishes, we'll write it up like the one you just read and email it to you.
펜앤마이크TV published 67 in the last 7 days.
