Han Dong-hoon Raises Allegations Against Kim Seung-won, Reveals Song Young-gil's Real Name

This appears to be a shift in his attack target from National Assembly member Yong Hye-in to nominee Kim Seung-won.

New TamSa interprets Han Dong-hoon's move as an attempt to assert his presence within the People Power Party.

Until now, former Minister Han Dong-hoon's attacks against National Assembly member Yong Hye-in had been a one-sided affair. However, the situation has changed with Han Dong-hoon taking the lead in attacking nominee Kim Seung-won.

As a result, his influence is expanding, garnering significant media attention.

At the same time, he argued that public disclosure of the data was necessary for the public's right to know and for the public interest, while categorizing the Democratic Party's questioning of the allegations as illegal behavior.

He emphasized that preventing the birth of an unqualified Minister of Justice is a public interest, dismissing the Democratic Party's allegations of illegality as groundless.

The hosts strongly criticized Han Dong-hoon's current attitude as 'whataboutism' (내로남불).

He targeted the incumbent lawmaker based solely on the text message content without verifying the individual, specifically mentioning phrases like 'Does Song Young-gil only move if you give him money?' used in the messages.

They criticized his claim of 'the public's right to know' as a case of 'whataboutism' (내로남불) when compared to his past stance.

In contrast, it was pointed out that former Minister Han Dong-hoon chose to immediately disclose text message content and question it without considering the context between the individuals involved or undergoing a fact-checking process.

Specifically, they suggested making a bold proposal to use Han Dong-hoon's frequently used 'betting' method in reverse, by offering to bet their respective National Assembly seats on the truth.

The video contains former Minister Han Dong-hoon's attitude and statements from that time, which are now being compared and analyzed with the current situation.

He emphasized that he does not drink alcohol and had never been to the said location, demanding Kim Eui-kyeom provide evidence for the allegations.

Furthermore, former Minister Han Dong-hoon mentioned Kim Eui-kyeom's past record of lying about National Assembly member Lee Jae-jung and the Cho Kuk case without apologizing, and even proposed a 'bet' to Kim Eui-kyeom for continuously raising allegations.

In this way, he responded strongly to the allegations, declaring that he would stake everything, including his position as Minister of Justice, to prove that they were not true.

He demanded that the opposing side cease making baseless allegations, while also counterattacking by referring to the 'stalking' allegations raised by National Assembly member Kim Eui-kyeom's side at the time.

New TamSa host questioned former Minister Han Dong-hoon's past claim that he 'never even crossed paths' with former President Lee Se-chang.

It was noted that there was evidence of former President Lee Se-chang being present at a gathering where President Yoon Suk-yeol called in cabinet members, which could contradict Han Dong-hoon's claim.

New TamSa hosts commented that former Minister Han Dong-hoon's response to the 'Cheongdam-dong bar' allegations, even staking his ministerial position, was an 'overreaction.'

They assessed that it is necessary to examine whether his current method of targeting National Assembly member Song Young-gil shows a similar pattern.

Nominee Kim lamented his past prosecutorial investigation record, and the off-site debate with former Minister Han Dong-hoon is expected to intensify.

This is interpreted as Han Dong-hoon's move with the intention of increasing his political visibility through nominee Kim Seung-won.

Accordingly, a fierce debate is anticipated to unfold between Han Dong-hoon, nominee Kim Seung-won, and National Assembly member Kim Dong-a at the future confirmation hearing.