If Jung Chung-rae loses, 40% of the blame is Yoo Si-min's: "lack of ethics of responsibility"

He stressed that both were edited, but the impact of the Maebul Show remarks was greater.

This shows how forceful Yoo's remarks were, and that even Kim Eo-jun had to moderate some of them.

He argued that Yoo's remarks worked in a direction that did not help Jung Chung-rae.

This suggests Yoo could take political steps beyond being a mere commentator.

Citing the case of Ahn Cheol-soo, a former lawmaker who was a presidential contender and therefore able to found the People's Party, he explained that the existence of a strong presidential contender is an essential condition for founding a new party.

He rated this ability as the best in the country and acknowledged that Yoo has helped many people understand issues.

He analyzed that Yoo becomes an extreme partisan in such situations, and explained that this attitude instead shapes a critical outlook.

He said it would be ideal if Yoo kept his distance from politics and simply organized complicated political stories for the public, but worried that direct involvement like the current one could backfire.

Yet Yoo, he criticized, drives critics into the category of abnormal beings and crosses the line.

This suggests Yoo feels uncomfortable about the decline of his influence.

This passage shows the deep personal bond among the three.

He saw Yoo as aiming to amplify his power of interpretation and create synergy through Kim's influence.

However, he explained that this approach no longer works under the current government because the subject of power has changed. He stressed that the political environment shifted as the president changed.

Commentator Kim Yong-min analyzed that Yoo Si-min's anxiety to keep the influence he once had produced reckless moves such as the 'ABC theory'. He argued that dividing the world into A, B, and C is nonsense, and pointed out that such excess is the result of failing to accept changing times. This suggests Yoo's current political moves may appear to cling to past glory.

Former lawmaker Park Won-seok explained that Yoo Si-min tends to choose, at the right moment, the platform on which he wants to be active. Citing his past use of a platform like 'Sajang Namcheon-dong' that was both influential and appealing to young people, he suggested that Yoo strategically selects channels that maximize his influence.

He explained that while Yoo dominates South Korea and acts fearlessly against the president, progressive parties aim to nurture the socially vulnerable and solve difficult problems from the standpoint of minorities, a fundamental difference. This suggests Yoo focuses more on exercising personal influence than on the values of a progressive party.

Former lawmaker Park Won-seok criticized Yoo Si-min for only founding parties without taking responsibility for maintaining them, tending to evade political responsibility. He said Yoo showed highly irresponsible conduct when cutting ties or severing relations, citing the Reform Party as a representative case. Although Yoo argued the Reform Party should be maintained, he himself declared its dissolution, causing great confusion.

He explained that the Unified Progressive Party was formed while the National Participation Party had about 800 million won in debt, and that Unified Progressive Party members raised special party dues to repay nearly 1.5 billion won of it. This leads to the criticism that Yoo evaded political responsibility and shifted the burden onto others.

He stressed that although Yoo is not a politician, as a figure close to politics with significant influence, he needs to anticipate what results his words and actions will bring and take responsibility for those results. However, he criticized Yoo for lacking such an ethic.

He noted that Jeong, as the staff official who stayed on site and watched everything, would know Yoo's actions better than anyone. This adds credibility to the criticism of Yoo's lack of an ethics of responsibility.