Yoon Sang-hyun, Chairman of the NEC Special Investigation Committee, Controversial for 'Don't be certain it's a fraudulent election' Remark

The National Election Commission stated that it 'cannot agree with the claim that the erroneous voter turnout input is evidence of a fraudulent election; it is merely a simple error.' This stance has fueled public backlash rather than alleviating suspicions among those who claim voter turnout manipulation.

They argue that the NEC's explanation is insufficient and that there is a possibility of systematic intervention, demanding a thorough investigation into the truth.

The public is demanding a clear answer to 'why' the Election Commission engaged in a series of concealment acts. It is pointed out that if it was a simple mistake, they should have done their best to prove it, but the NEC only showed behavior that seemed to conceal the relevant facts. Witness K questioned the NEC's actions, asking, "Why would they do something with such a high risk?"

Witness K strongly criticized, asking, "What is Yoon Sang-hyun's position now? Is he just an ordinary member of parliament? No. As the Chairman of the Special Committee for Parliamentary Investigation, he should have been chosen by the People Power Party as someone who would conduct the investigation well, and he volunteered for it. Did he volunteer to mess this up?" raising doubts about his proper performance of his role as chairman.

When Chairman Yoon Sang-hyun made remarks that seemed to defend the NEC, suspicions arose that he might be involved in 'judicial risks.' The broadcast pointed out that politicians belonging to the People Power Party who engage in political acts that please Lee Jae-myung (the leader of the main opposition party) generally carry judicial risks, and the suspicion is spreading that Chairman Yoon Sang-hyun also falls into this category.

The broadcast refuted the observers' claims, arguing that simply posting on a bulletin board does not make rigging impossible, and that manipulation is possible through internal directives without even needing hacking.

It was argued that the definition of a true 'conspiracy theorist' needs to be redefined in the current situation. It is not someone who speaks definitively without evidence who is a conspiracy theorist, but rather someone who, despite suspicious circumstances being revealed, does not doubt and definitively claims that one should not doubt, who is the real conspiracy theorist. This reflects a critical view of attempts to suppress suspicions related to the NEC's voter turnout input error incident.

This criticizes the practice of labeling suspicions about the NEC as conspiracy theories and emphasizes the argument that the truth must be revealed through an investigation request.

This raises expectations for a thorough investigation into the truth of the NEC's voter turnout input error allegations.

There is high expectation that the truth will be clearly revealed through this investigation, as it is a time when investigative capabilities are maximized.

In a situation where there is evidence that the number of voters changed due to electronic manipulation, the criticism is that the chairman's attempt to prevent certainty instead of acknowledging room for doubt is an act of forgetting his position.

It is like preventing a search for a missing person even when there are clues to their whereabouts, simply because there is no definitive evidence. The fraudulent election issue is about pursuing the truth, so attempts to stifle the desire to investigate it are strange.

The meaning of the expression 'burn it down' used in rallies was explained. It signifies not merely setting a physical fire, but rather metaphorically burning away false ideologies related to fraudulent elections and igniting a passion to uncover the truth. It is interpreted as an expression of determination to continuously maintain awareness of the issue of fraudulent elections.

It was stated that people gather day and night at Olympic Park (Olpark) shouting about fraudulent elections, re-elections, and manual vote counting on election day, but this spark is weakening, thus encouraging active participation. The message conveyed was to gather strength to create a bigger flame.

This points out the attitude of only criticizing without active participation and urges direct action.

This event appears to be aimed at raising voices for both Liberation Day commemoration and uncovering the truth about fraudulent elections.

It was predicted that this phenomenon would become clear when the party convention ends and the 'honeymoon phase' wears off.

He demanded that Chairman Yoon bow his head in apology and 'shout for the absent party leader in the National Assembly,' stating that if he does so, he would be forgiven once. This highlights the immense dissatisfaction with Chairman Yoon Sang-hyun's attitude.

Jang Dong-ran concluded the broadcast by promising to meet viewers at Woosung Apartments Blocks 1, 2, and 3 on Saturday afternoon at 2:30 PM.

Witness K announced that an additional broadcast, as a review of today's broadcast, would be held approximately 30-40 minutes after the main broadcast concludes, and asked for many viewers to tune in.