Han Dong-hoon Gate, Silence of the Democratic-Progressive Camp

In particular, criticism has been raised that the Jo Guk Innovation Party is also showing a passive response to this issue.

Such silence suggests the possibility of complex strategic calculations within the camp.

This implies the existence of a perspective that interprets the matter in terms of internal power struggles within the democratic-progressive camp.

Some also harbor expectations for Kim Min-seok's achievements to fail, leading to observations that these internal dynamics are influencing the response to the Han Dong-hoon issue.

Questions have also been raised about the change in attitude of former Minister Jo Guk, who previously spearheaded the confrontation with Han Dong-hoon.

A critical view is growing regarding the current situation, which is limited to perfunctory mentions and a lack of drive for pledged policies.

As the nature of the case is expected to change, opinions have been raised that surveillance is needed for evidence destruction, such as monitoring reporters' re-subscriptions to Telegram.

Observations also suggest that past prosecutorial methods of concealment would be difficult in the current situation.

The current situation appears to involve manipulated evidence with severe editing and distortion, and analysis suggests a high probability of the police obtaining search and seizure warrants. It is anticipated that numerous clear pieces of evidence remain, making it difficult to avoid search and seizure.

Expectations have also emerged that this investigation could provide an opportunity for the police to regain public trust after the separation of investigative and prosecutorial powers.