Han Dong-hoon's Facebook, Allegations of Linkage with DC Gallery

Analysis suggested that the prosecution's decision, under then-Minister of Justice Park Sung-jae, to make a favorable ruling for Candidate Kim was unusual.

It was reported that the Supreme Prosecutors' Office also believed that the case would be difficult to sustain in court and could only result in political embarrassment. This complex set of considerations is believed to have been the background for the deferred indictment decision.

This morning, a tip revealed that posts related to Han Dong-hoon were being uploaded continuously.

In response, New 탐사 (New Tam-sa) downloaded approximately 50,000 Han Dong-hoon-related posts from DC Inside that morning and conducted a comparison.

Analysis of the collected data confirmed numerous posts related to the Cheongdam-dong bar allegations and incidents involving the People Power Party.

This large volume of posts and repetitive content amplified questions about the possibility of public opinion manipulation.

A circular structure was confirmed where Rep. Han posts on Facebook, it's reported by the media, these articles are shared on a DC gallery, and then Rep. Han reposts that DC gallery post on his Facebook.

This shows Rep. Han's statements completing a full circle, passing through the media and community before returning to him. In particular, tracking the original source of the posts via Facebook's Open Graph information clearly revealed this path.

The actual source of the post was revealed through the small box (Open Graph) automatically generated when an internet address is pasted onto Facebook. This box explicitly stated that the link originated from 'Conservative Minor Gallery DC Inside'.

This meant it was not a typical newspaper article address, but rather the address of a specific post on DC that had captured the article.

New 탐사 (New Tam-sa) secured and analyzed the number of the relevant DC post and the captured data.

This method was presented as clear evidence that the source of the information was a specific community post, not a media article.

A total of 452 posts were made since September 1st, with frequent posting activity observed, averaging 28 posts per day.

In particular, a pattern of a large number of posts being uploaded between 5 AM and 6 AM was identified. While it's possible that aides share or operate the account, such early morning activity is unusual, leading to the presumption that he is most likely posting directly.

Typically, it's a natural path for Facebook posts to be shared in communities. However, yesterday evening, an instance was found where the address of a DC Inside community post was uploaded to Rep. Han Dong-hoon's Facebook and then deleted approximately 12 minutes later.

This is an unusual case where information flowed in reverse, from the community to Facebook. Coupled with the phenomenon of specific community accounts systematically disseminating information, suspicions about this reverse distribution channel have been raised.

Analysis of activity within the DC gallery confirmed mechanical and repetitive posting by a specific account. Out of a total of 1,127 posts, a single account posted a staggering 83%.

This account was active every single day for 48 days, posting at an average interval of 4 minutes, showing perfect attendance in its activity.

This pattern is difficult to attribute to voluntary activity by supporters and strongly suggests the possibility of organized intervention.

Currently, there is no confirmable evidence to support the claim that Rep. Han Dong-hoon himself is the owner of a specific DC account or that recommendations were systematically boosted. New 탐사 (New Tam-sa) stated that such direct evidence would be difficult to find without a server seizure and search.

Furthermore, it was added that who ordered these intermediary activities and whether there was compensation for such activities are also currently unconfirmable areas.