£12 Billion Annual Spending on Migrant Benefits
Carol Malone described the current welfare system as "obscene" and "unsustainable" for taxpayers, arguing that Britain's welfare state should exist primarily for its citizens rather than migrants.
A GB News panel debates the sustainability and fairness of the UK's welfare system amidst rising costs for foreign nationals.
Carol Malone described the current welfare system as "obscene" and "unsustainable" for taxpayers, arguing that Britain's welfare state should exist primarily for its citizens rather than migrants.
The total Universal Credit figure has reportedly increased by £3 billion since 2024, raising concerns about the system's long-term viability.
Critics estimate that 3.6 million people are under no obligation to work for the rest of their lives, while a workforce of 34 million taxpayers struggles to sustain support for global claimants, leading Christys to call for an end to the UK acting as the "benefits office to the world."
이 채널, 다음 영상도 놓치지 마세요
새 영상이 올라오면 지금처럼 읽기 좋은 아티클로 정리해 이메일로 보내 드려요.
He referenced a GB News report indicating a single earner needs a £71,000 salary to match the benefits received by a non-working family of three, arguing that working families expect those on benefits to be poorer than themselves and criticizing politicians for failing to implement concrete solutions.
They asserted that the only way to reduce the overall benefit bill is through strong government action, such as limiting or eliminating benefits for migrants, a sentiment echoed by the host who stated that Britain is "broken" due to high welfare spending.
A speaker criticized former Home Office officials for complaining about benefit figures that increased during their tenure, suggesting a lack of accountability.
The 11.9 billion pound figure was challenged as misleading, with the argument that it refers to households with a foreign national rather than direct payments exclusively to foreign nationals, citing personal family background to highlight the complexity of household benefit claims.
The host, Patrick Christys, posed a fundamental question about whether the state should pay benefits to individuals who have entered the country but have not contributed.
The discussion then moved to the eligibility for 'leave to remain' and the potential for a two-year waiting period before migrants can claim benefits.
The debate further explored whether long-term workers who have paid National Insurance for decades deserve state support, irrespective of their nationality.
A speaker noted that asylum seekers arriving by small boats receive approximately £40 a week for basic necessities, emphasizing the minimal nature of this support.
However, the host challenged the prevailing narrative that immigration is a "boon for the economy," labeling it a "catastrophic drain" and shifting the discussion to whether long-term residents should be denied benefits, such as Universal Credit, during severe health crises like cancer.
자막에서 근거가 되는 대목을 찾아 답합니다.
GBNews의 다음 영상도 받아볼까요?
GBNews에 새 영상이 올라오면, 방금 읽으신 것처럼 정리해서 메일로 보내 드릴게요.
이 채널은 지난 7일 동안 154편 올렸어요.
숏츠는 빼고 보내 드려요.