DHS Mandates Audits as China Targets US Elections

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced a new policy requiring a mandatory 5% paper ballot audit in every state and jurisdiction across America. This measure is intended to safeguard the integrity of future elections, particularly focusing on the 2026 election cycle. The long-term objective is to transition to election machines primarily composed of U.S.-made parts by 2028, reducing reliance on foreign components.

In conjunction with the new DHS mandate, two reports from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were released, confirming that China is aggressively attempting to infiltrate and influence U.S. election ecosystems. These reports, generated by the Biden administration's ODNI, highlight the urgency behind the new security measures.

China's economic vulnerability, particularly its reliance on American markets, is identified as a significant point of leverage for the U.S. Without access to American consumers, China's economic power would be substantially diminished. This was a strategy previously employed by the Trump administration in 2020, which involved de-listing Chinese companies from U.S. stock exchanges.

The U.S. has also used economic pressure on other nations, such as Iran, to indirectly impact China. By imposing sanctions and reducing oil sales from Iran, the U.S. can disrupt China's energy supply chain, as China is a major consumer of Iranian oil. This multifaceted approach aims to exert economic influence and curb Chinese geopolitical ambitions.

A special commemoration is being held to honor the Maryland 400, marking the 250th anniversary of their courageous actions. The American Legion post is hosting a ceremony to reflect on their significant contribution to American history. This event highlights the enduring legacy of their sacrifice.

The Maryland 400 played a critical role as a rear guard during the Battle of Long Island, protecting the Continental Army from the British invasion. Their sacrifice prevented the British from annihilating the American forces at the East River. Many historians believe that without their actions, the American Revolution would have likely ended in defeat, underscoring their crucial contribution to securing American independence.

Their strategic resistance allowed George Washington to successfully evacuate his troops, preserving the nascent American army. The speaker emphasizes that their bravery ensured the survival of the revolution, contrasting an alternate history where Americans might still be under British rule.

Author Patrick K. O'Donnell recounted his 16-year journey to document the story of the Maryland 400, which he titled 'Washington's Immortals'. His research began almost to the day 16 years ago, when he stumbled upon a plaque in Brooklyn honoring Colonel Willie Bule and the Maryland heroes. This discovery inspired him to delve into their history.

O'Donnell's book illuminates the unit's bravery and sacrifice, describing them as the first 'band of brothers' in the American Revolution. His extensive work aimed to bring their story to a wider audience, ensuring their legacy as pivotal figures in the nation's founding.

History often demonstrates how minor actions can dramatically alter its course, and the Maryland 400's story is a prime example. Composed of wealthy and honorable men from Maryland, they formed the Baltimore Independent Cadets in 1774, showcasing their dedication to the cause of liberty even before the war.

Their sacrifice at the Battle of Long Island is considered a moment of extreme importance for American liberty. Their ability to hold back the British forces, allowing Washington's army to escape, highlights how individual and collective bravery in a single battle can prevent the complete collapse of a revolution. This act of selflessness underscored the profound impact of their commitment to freedom.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody has rejected a multi-state settlement with Meta, deeming it inadequate to address the long-term harm caused to children. Moody described the settlement as 'peanuts,' noting it represented less than 1% of Meta's annual revenue. She asserted that the deal failed to implement meaningful and lasting changes.

Moody emphasized that Florida would not compromise on child safety, refusing to sign off on temporary programmatic changes that would expire within five years. The Attorney General's office is committed to pursuing more substantial reforms to protect young users from the harmful effects of social media.

Attorney General Ashley Moody articulated Florida's commitment to challenging Big Tech, stating she did not take her job to concede to major technology companies. She criticized the proposed settlement for being unacceptable and indicated that Florida seeks true reparations for the harms caused by social media.

Evidence suggests that Meta's algorithms were intentionally designed to be addictive, leading to claims of links between social media use and eating disorders, mental injury, and violence among young users. Florida aims to establish a precedent that Big Tech cannot profit from practices that harm children, pursuing justice through sustained legal action rather than accepting a quick financial payout.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody asserted that the proposed settlement did not go far enough to protect children. While acknowledging that some measures, such as limiting children's access to apps, are steps in the right direction, she emphasized their insufficiency. Moody is demanding true age verification, moving beyond simple 'curfew' style restrictions for young users.

She also advocated for prohibitions on phone usage during school hours to reduce screen time and its associated negative impacts. Florida seeks permanent policy changes from social media companies, rather than temporary, five-year fixes, to ensure lasting protection for children.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody announced her office's readiness to proceed with litigation against Meta, expressing confidence in their legal team. The state is recruiting specialized legal talent to litigate against the tech giant, indicating a robust legal strategy. Moody stated their intention to 'rake through discovery' and obtain every possible email, aiming to expose internal communications and top-level decision-making processes.

This extensive discovery process is designed to transparently reveal the full extent of harm inflicted upon young users by Meta's platforms. Florida's strategy focuses on winning in court to achieve significant, lasting reforms rather than settling for what they consider inadequate agreements.

Allegations have surfaced against Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, accusing him of demonizing the Amish community in Lancaster, PA, in connection with measles reports. Critics claim there is a contradiction between the Governor's reported death toll from measles and the data provided by the local coroner. These accusations suggest a political motivation behind Shapiro's statements, potentially tied to his perceived presidential ambitions.

Jack Pobic argues that the issue extends beyond public health, framing it as a religious freedom argument pertaining specifically to the Amish Christians. He contends that the Governor's rhetoric targeted not only the unvaccinated population but also unjustly maligned a specific religious group.

A significant discrepancy has been reported regarding measles deaths in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The Lancaster County coroner's office maintains that there have been zero legal measles deaths, a direct contradiction to statements made by state officials, including Governor Josh Shapiro, at a recent press conference. This disparity raises questions about the accuracy of public health reporting.

Critics have accused the media of failing to fact-check the Governor's claims, allowing potentially misleading information to circulate without verification. The conflicting reports have fueled public debate and deepened distrust in official accounts.

Steve Bannon characterized the opposition to the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement as a proxy war orchestrated by Big Pharma, with Governor Josh Shapiro acting as their instrument. Bannon identified Shapiro as one of Big Pharma's 'running dogs,' working against efforts to improve public health.

The fight is framed as a defense against chronic illnesses affecting children, advocating for a significant shift in healthcare policy. Bannon positioned Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the emblem of this healthcare revolution, leading the charge against pharmaceutical industry influence.

Tony Lyons asserted that Big Pharma views the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) coalition as a direct threat to its revenue, particularly if Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gains significant influence. Lyons claimed that the pharmaceutical industry recognizes Kennedy's long-standing dedication to child health and fears his potential impact on their profits.

Lyons described the MAGA/MAHA coalition as the most powerful political force in U.S. history, capable of challenging established narratives. He argued that the current public health discourse, specifically concerning measles, is a 'psyop' designed to serve the interests of Big Pharma, underscoring the deep ideological conflict at play.

Tony Lyons claimed that the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement was responsible for a significant 6% shift in voter allegiance in the 2024 election, with these voters switching to support Donald Trump. This shift was attributed to their belief that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s work through MAHA would bring about transformative changes in public health. This suggests a considerable impact of the health agenda on the electorate.

Lyons warned of severe political repercussions if the movement were to lose in the midterms, predicting immediate impeachment efforts against Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He emphasized the ongoing political retaliation against the MAHA movement, highlighting the high stakes involved in its efforts to challenge the established healthcare system and political norms.