Sisa Tapa and Park Si-young TV Simultaneously Suspend Broadcasts... Concerns of 'Golden Phone' Evidence Destruction

The YouTube channel 'Sisa Tapa' temporarily suspended article uploads immediately after Supreme Council member Kim Min-seok, CEO of Daeyang, instructed a legal review of YouTube channels involved in public opinion manipulation during a Supreme Council meeting. The host believes that Kim Min-seok's directive for legal review likely influenced Sisa Tapa's decision to go on hiatus.

Sisa Tapa announced its hiatus citing reorganization and claims it is unrelated to New Tam Sa's report.

Sisa Tapa announced that it stopped uploading articles on August 20th, but the host pointed out that this was likely an attempt to show it was not influenced by New Tam Sa's report. The actual hiatus announcement was made on August 24th, yet the date listed was earlier.

This is interpreted as an attempt to deny any connection between New Tam Sa's report and the hiatus.

Coinciding with Sisa Tapa's hiatus, 'Park Si-young TV' also announced a one-week hiatus starting August 24th. This is effectively the same date Sisa Tapa began its hiatus.

The host mentioned that Sisa Tapa's operator and CEO Park Si-young are known to be close and have a history of supporting candidate Jung Chung-rae.

Consequently, suspicions are growing that the two channels intentionally went on simultaneous hiatus to discuss countermeasures regarding the public opinion manipulation allegations.

In response to a reporter's question, 'Have you ever spoken to Lee Jong-won regarding this matter?', CEO Park Si-young replied, "I have never spoken to Lee Jong-won at all. This is absurd and unpleasant."

CEO Park Si-young flatly denied having spoken to Lee Jong-won and expressed displeasure at the question itself.

However, he did not provide a clear answer to the question of whether he provided advice on public opinion polls.

Park Si-young's side claims that this vacation schedule was confirmed three months in advance. However, the host pointed out that three months prior, the exact date of the party convention was unknown, and the convention date was only confirmed in mid to late July.

An analysis suggested that it is highly unusual for a public opinion polling expert to go on vacation during a major political event like a party convention.

Consequently, doubts about CEO Park Si-young's explanation of his vacation schedule are intensifying.

Mr. Park Si-young explained that he has never spoken to Mr. Lee Jong-won and that the overlap in hiatus periods was merely a coincidence with his own vacation schedule.

He claimed that this vacation schedule was confirmed a full three months in advance.

However, doubts persist about the timing of confirming a vacation schedule when important political events like the party convention had not yet been finalized.

The host explained why Mr. Park Si-young finds it difficult to refute the current situation, linking it to the results of the pro-establishment Supreme Council member election.

An analysis suggests that if Mr. Park Si-young actively expresses his position, there would be political pressure that could not only affect the votes obtained by the pro-establishment candidates but also potentially change the rankings of the current three pro-establishment Supreme Council members.

The host revealed that while Mr. Lee Jong-won used to respond to reporters' text questions, he has stopped doing so at some point.

Currently, Mr. Lee Jong-won still does not reply to the host's texts or answer calls, only responding with remarks like 'I need to prepare for broadcast,' 'I'll see you later,' or 'Send me what you want to say by text.'

This is presumed to be a change in his response strategy after consulting with a lawyer.

The host directly asked Mr. Lee Jong-won, 'You said over 200 people authenticated their votes after watching your broadcast; wasn't that an exaggeration?'

Mr. Lee Jong-won read the message but did not respond to it.

The host asked Mr. Lee Jong-won, 'If the party conducts a fact-finding investigation, would you be willing to voluntarily submit the phone that received the vote authentication texts?'

However, Mr. Lee Jong-won has not yet read this message, it was confirmed.

On August 14th, while closing his manipulated broadcast, Mr. Lee Jong-won stated, 'About 60 to 70 people messaged me today,' adding, 'I think I secured about 5,000 votes today.'

However, the host recalled that the actual number of interactions Lee Jong-won had during the broadcast was at most no more than 10. This significant discrepancy between the actual communication count and the figures mentioned on air raises suspicions of data inflation.

The host analyzed that the primary purpose of Mr. Lee Jong-won's live broadcasts was to collect information on when national public opinion poll calls would conclude in each region.

He raised suspicions that the collected information was likely shared with Jung Chung-rae's supporters to induce false responses and ensure that as many of Jung Chung-rae's supporters as possible were included in the polling sample.

The host emphasized that Mr. Lee Jong-won's phone is crucial evidence, comparable to the 'golden phone' from the past Myeong Tae-gyun incident.

This is because the phone likely contains text messages and call records indicating public opinion manipulation, as well as a list of those involved in the manipulation and related candidates.

The host asked Mr. Lee Jong-won, 'If the party conducts a fact-finding investigation, would you be willing to submit your phone?'

However, Mr. Lee Jong-won has read the question but has not yet responded. If this phone is obtained, the names of those involved and candidates could be revealed.

The host predicted that Mr. Lee Jong-won would likely have already disposed of the 'golden phone' or decided not to submit it to investigative authorities.

While there's a high possibility of the phone being discarded or the SIM card being changed, the list of callers can still be identified through telecommunication company records.

However, he emphasized that seizing the phone is essential to prove the actual call contents and clearly reveal the manipulation.

The host analyzed that there must be masterminds behind Mr. Lee Jong-won, who usually likes 'acting tough,' suddenly having to go on hiatus.

He explained that from the perspective of the masterminds, if Mr. Lee Jong-won continued broadcasting, it would be difficult to control him and evidence could be leaked, so they likely forced a hiatus to control his statements.

The host attempted to call Mr. Lee Jong-won, but it was confirmed that Mr. Lee Jong-won had definitely blocked the host's number.

The host analyzed that this indicates he did not completely turn off his phone, but rather is selectively blocking certain numbers while still receiving calls.

The host emphasized the urgency due to the high possibility of evidence contained in Mr. Lee Jong-won's phone being destroyed.

Accordingly, he urged the Democratic Party to swiftly accuse Mr. Lee Jong-won to enable the seizure of his phone.

He repeatedly stressed the importance of prompt action, especially mentioning the risk of evidence damage through SIM card changes or other means.