Lee Jae-myung's Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low, Concerns of Entering 20s

This figure indicates the breakdown of the 35% mark. Jung Woo-jin, head of Freedom and Responsibility, predicted that Lee Jae-myung's approval rating could fall into the 20s before October. The host emphasized the seriousness of the situation, stating that the decline in Lee Jae-myung's approval rating is no longer surprising.

In contrast, negative evaluations reached 62.8%, twice the positive figure. The host highlighted that the positive evaluation dropped below 35% and the negative evaluation exceeded 60%, explaining that public disfavor towards Lee Jae-myung is intensifying.

Jung Woo-jin analyzed this remark as an indication that Kim Eo-jun's side recognizes the seriousness of the situation and is trying to distance itself from Lee Jae-myung. Kim Eo-jun's change in stance regarding Lee Jae-myung's criminal charges also suggests potential factionalism and conflicts of interest within the pro-opposition camp.

It was mentioned that Kim Eo-jun recently received a fine for defamation in connection with reporter Lee Dong-jae. Jung Woo-jin noted Kim Eo-jun's warning about Lee Jae-myung's declining approval rating after this incident, commenting that his changed attitude sounds like 'save me.' It was suggested that this could be perceived as a threatening message rather than mere concern.

This is based on the analysis that the fixed support base of basic income recipients and those receiving basic income is solid. Referring to the significant increase in basic income recipients during the Moon Jae-in administration, it was explained that these individuals are likely to serve as Lee Jae-myung's lower support limit. The current approval rating in the 30s is largely influenced by this fixed support base.

Witness K pointed out the unusually high negative evaluation among those in their 30s, emphasizing the severe loss of support for Lee Jae-myung among young people.

Past government real estate policies caused significant deprivation among ordinary citizens, with controversy particularly over a permit system for housing transactions and relocation. Jang Dong-ran cited an example where a district office official told a family of four that a 19-pyeong apartment was sufficient, dissuading them from moving. It is analyzed that such policies have fueled the anger of young people and contributed to the decline in Lee Jae-myung's approval rating.

Jang Dong-ran mentioned that this butterfly effect is enormous, potentially changing the entire real estate transaction system. While ordinary citizens often face tax investigations when taking out loans, Lee Jae-myung's case has sparked controversy over fairness, further deepening the sense of deprivation among young people.

He suggested that it could be interpreted as a curse or an attack aimed at Lee Jae-myung. This indicates that the movement within the pro-opposition camp to turn its back on Lee Jae-myung is becoming increasingly overt.

This is analyzed as an important yardstick for gauging their political relationship and current situation.

This represents a complete reversal from his previous stance of supporting Lee Jae-myung and is cited as a factor intensifying conflict within the opposition.

Jung Woo-jin reported that there is divided interpretation within political circles on whether Jo Kuk intentionally staged this situation or if it was accidentally captured. This photo, coupled with Lee Jae-myung's declining approval rating, was cited as an example of subtle shifts in sentiment within the opposition.

The host stated that the Blue House is adhering to the position of 'listening to their explanations at the hearing' despite public opposition. This amplifies suspicions about the background that allowed the candidates to persist.

Her adherence to her position despite public opposition is expected to generate further controversy during the public hearing process.

The host emphasized that PenNMike will definitely cover the hearing on-site and urged Representative Yong Hye-in to attend and explain herself. The People Power Party aims to clarify the suspicions surrounding Yong Hye-in's concurrent position through this hearing.

Witness K explained that third-party bribery can result in imprisonment of up to five years or a fine of up to 100 million won, and if the bribe exceeds 100 million won, it could lead to 10 years or more, or even life imprisonment. Whether Representative Kim Seung-won was aware of Yang's situation is expected to be a major point of contention.

Witness K explained that this report indicates signs of the Blue House's involvement in the incident and that additional details related to the Blue House may emerge during the investigation. This suggests that the allegations against Representative Kim Seung-won could expand beyond a personal matter to involve the Blue House.

He stated that Kang Shin-chul appears to be making forced arguments even without logic to become a minister, pointing out the discrepancy between his past image and current actions.

Lee Jae-myung previously sparked controversy by making incorrect claims about border control in the Gaza Strip. Witness K mentioned that at the time, a vice minister accompanying Lee Jae-myung was flustered and stumbled during logical rebuttals. It was reported that Lee Jae-myung subsequently stopped mentioning Palestine. This was cited as an example demonstrating Lee Jae-myung's lack of expertise in foreign policy and security matters.

Small investors are claiming damages related to this recording, and the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency has reassigned the case, with Yeongdeungpo Police Station commencing a re-investigation. Witness K explained that since the case, which was previously suspended, has been re-investigated, there is a possibility of re-indictment. This suggests that Representative Kim Seung-won's legal risks may once again come to the forefront.