Yong Hye-in's Appointment Faces Public Criticism

Public anger is escalating over the cabinet reshuffle orchestrated by leader Lee Jae-myung. In particular, the appointment of certain individuals, including Representative Yong Hye-in, is being criticized as personnel choices that disregard the public.

Although some pro-Moon Jae-in figures were included, Park Gwang-bae analyzed this as a lack of confidence on Lee Jae-myung's part. Furthermore, suspicions that the appointment of candidate Kim Seung-won is for 'bulletproof' purposes have amplified the controversy.

This appointment is interpreted as Lee Jae-myung's intention to strengthen his pro-Lee system.

Witness K argued that women in their 20s and 30s are leaving due to realistic issues like real estate policy, not feminism, pointing out the limitations of a political engineering approach.

Housing insecurity for the 2030 generation is deepening. They face the reality of struggling to even secure housing for residential purposes due to the depletion of jeonse (long-term lease deposit) listings. Witness K emphasized that real estate is a very important part of life for the 2030 generation.

Witness K criticized the government's sudden policy changes, which are packaged as benefiting those without homes, but in reality, are severely impacting the 2030 generation.

This situation is similar to the real estate policy failures of the past Moon Jae-in administration, with numerous cases of the 2030 generation's homeownership plans being thwarted by policy changes.

Public backlash against Representative Yong Hye-in's appointment is intensifying. Seonwoo Yoon-ho mentioned that even former Democratic Party interim leader Park Ji-hyun criticized Representative Yong Hye-in, indicating that critical voices are emerging from within the party.

Even among elementary school students, resentment towards Representative Yong Hye-in is observed, and dislike is deepening across all age groups.

Some analyses suggest that strengthening feminist policies is actually leading to an explosive exodus of male supporters.

The panelists pointed out that she misused a facility that is only permitted for official reasons.

This led to criticism for violating the regulations for official business trips by National Assembly members.

The semi-interlocking proportional representation system generated suspicions of political maneuvering when the electoral reform bill was fast-tracked. The panelists criticized that while the Moon Jae-in government intended a system for the Justice Party, the Democratic Party established satellite parties, rendering its original intent meaningless.

In this process, Representative Yong Hye-in's continuous tenure as a proportional representative has become controversial.

Concurrently, it was revealed that Representative Yong Hye-in's husband is working as a party official, holding a strategic planning position.

The panelists criticized this as running the party to secure income for family members.

The panelists pointed out that ordinary young people would inevitably be angry about such an increase in wealth.

She has been branded a traitor within the progressive camp and is becoming a target of criticism, with civic and religious groups increasingly calling for her resignation as a lawmaker.

The panelists jokingly referred to her weight class and skills, saying it requires caution.

This can be interpreted as a concern about the possibility of her displaying strong-arm political tactics in hearings and other settings.

Representative Yong Hye-in's past political statements and actions further amplify these concerns.